ramess101 / JCED_FOMMS_Manuscript

0 stars 1 forks source link

Hardware description #17

Open ramess101 opened 5 years ago

ramess101 commented 5 years ago

@msoroush

I would like to include a one sentence description of the hardware you are using to run the cyclohexane simulations. Here is what it says so far:

image

Could you help me fill in the missing information? Also, please correct if you used a different compiler or GOMC version. Thanks!

msoroush commented 5 years ago

@ramess101

The cyclohexane results were obtained using development version of GOMC (it has not been released yet). GOMC was compiled using intel compiler 2018. I used one thread CPU for all simulations (liquid and vapor simulations). However, our cluster's hardwares are not all same.

Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5355 @ 2.66GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz

ramess101 commented 5 years ago

@msoroush

OK, thanks for clarifying this. So I should just say it was a development version?

I guess I assumed you used GPUs since yours ran faster than mine.

I think I will just list the different architectures in supporing information.

Thanks

On Saturday, December 15, 2018, Mohammad Soroush Barhaghi < notifications@github.com> wrote:

@ramess101 https://github.com/ramess101

The cyclohexane results were obtained using development version of GOMC (it has not been released yet). GOMC was compiled using intel compiler

  1. I used one thread CPU for all simulations (liquid and vapor simulations). However, our cluster's hardwares are not all same.

Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5355 @ 2.66GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz Info: Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ramess101/JCED_FOMMS_Manuscript/issues/17#issuecomment-447616776, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWUvhExKgx2N4oX4RYh5wu8vUrClyb76ks5u5cpIgaJpZM4ZU-oK .

msoroush commented 5 years ago

@ramess101 intel compiler is twice faster than GCC. GPU performance is good when we have electrostatic energy calculation in simulation. For these systems, we dont see much speedup using GPU.

msoroush commented 5 years ago

@ramess101 For GOMC version we can use development version since we merged the rings branch to development. Maybe @jpotoff can help with this issue.

ramess101 commented 5 years ago

@msoroush @jpotoff

Here is how the manuscript reads now:

image

And the SI:

image