The authors present a very clear example of cyclohexane to
demonstrate the utility of this approach in parametrizing new force
fields. Can the authors comment on the complexity of the optimization
process when more than two parameters need to be optimized (for example,
a molecule comprising of more than one type of interaction site)?
Further, while this maybe beyond the scope of this work, it may be
useful to comment on the ease/difficulty of using this approach when
vapor--liquid equilibria of mixtures are considered as part of the
scoring function.
I believe mixtures are outside of the scope of this work.
I will include a short statement about how we performed a single-site optimization so that it is easy to visualize. GCMC-MBAR should be just as reliable for a higher order optimization, all that would need to change is the optimization approach.
@mrshirts @jpotoff @msoroush
I believe mixtures are outside of the scope of this work.
I will include a short statement about how we performed a single-site optimization so that it is easy to visualize. GCMC-MBAR should be just as reliable for a higher order optimization, all that would need to change is the optimization approach.