Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by azizatif
on 18 Apr 2009 at 9:21
Additional information...
Using:
wget -O- --debug http://code.google.com/p/xtlib/issues/csv
Response indeed indicates UTF-8:
Content-Type: text/csv; charset=UTF-8
Full Wget debug output was:
DEBUG output created by Wget 1.10 on Windows.
--23:21:27-- http://code.google.com/p/xtlib/issues/csv
=> `-'
Resolving code.google.com... seconds 0.00, 74.125.43.113, 74.125.43.100,
74.125.43.101, ...
Caching code.google.com => 74.125.43.113 74.125.43.100 74.125.43.101
74.125.43.102
Connecting to code.google.com|74.125.43.113|:80... seconds 0.00, connected.
Created socket 304.
Releasing 0x002a1078 (new refcount 1).
---request begin---
GET /p/xtlib/issues/csv HTTP/1.0
User-Agent: Wget/1.10
Accept: */*
Host: code.google.com
Connection: Keep-Alive
---request end---
HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
---response begin---
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:21:24 GMT
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: Fri, 01 Jan 1990 00:00:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=xtlib-issues.csv
Content-Type: text/csv; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Set-Cookie:
PREF=ID=458a7c6629b607dc:TM=1240089684:LM=1240089684:S=BGoVIRiTCfCfsIEi;
expires=Mon, 18-Apr-2011 21:21:24 GMT; path=/; domain=.google.com
Server: codesite
---response end---
200 OK
cdm: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Stored cookie google.com -1 (ANY) / <permanent> <insecure> [expiry 2011-04-19
00:21:24] PREF
ID=458a7c6629b607dc:TM=1240089684:LM=1240089684:S=BGoVIRiTCfCfsIEi
Length: unspecified [text/csv]
Closed fd 304
23:21:27 (3.44 MB/s) - `-' saved [351]
Original comment by azizatif
on 18 Apr 2009 at 9:30
This issue seems to be due to an oversight in WebClient.DownloadString(Async).
Although it is documented to use WebClient.Encoding to convert the downloaded
bits
into a Unicode string, it should also be paying attention to the character set
of
indicated in the response header.
Original comment by azizatif
on 18 Apr 2009 at 9:48
Fixed in r115.
Original comment by azizatif
on 18 Apr 2009 at 10:26
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
digiqr
on 16 Apr 2009 at 11:21