Open bademux opened 8 years ago
Can you describe the behavior you would like to have?
I'm currently working on POC codegenerator for SparkFramework.
The main idea is a parser shares with consumer (JavaPoet writer in my case) only Model.
Parser
-> Model
-> Consumer
By saying "Model" I mean list of immutable
Action{
Uri;
HttpMethod;
Name;
Request{
Mime
Header[]
Param[]; //Query, Form, Uri
...
};
Response{
Mime
HttpCode
Header[]
...
};
.....
}
The Model was flatten as much as possible to have few dependant models. I can represent model to any kind of consumer without going by the spec in this way. Cost is data duplication: Action
is created as permutation of all important fields (Uri, HttpMethod, Name), it seems reasonable trade off, imno.
Writer feature (edition abilities) seem superfluous to me and can be implemented as additional tool.
Looking for your comment!
updated Action
on 2016-03-10 11:34 UTC
Could you please verify this model in V2 version ? thanks
Parser doesn`t provide abstraction for nested resources as it should. Basically it maps data to POJO and leaves you with handling specification on your own. Not the behavior I supposed to get from the official parser.
Aha! Link: https://mulesoft-roadmap.aha.io/features/APIRAML-136