Closed jpbelang closed 5 years ago
Continuing issue #600, datetime values have the same issues. This should fail but doesn't.
#%RAML 1.0 title: RAML Proxy version: v1 types: fireworks: type: datetime # no implications about offset examples: bad1: 20161-02-28T16:41:41Z bad2: 20161-02-28T16:41:41.090Z
We are headed for a year 10000 problem. You heard it here first :-)
Continuing issue #600, datetime values have the same issues. This should fail but doesn't.
We are headed for a year 10000 problem. You heard it here first :-)