The NamedExample fragment, being in the singular form, may lead to confusion as to whether it could be used to define a singular example as with example node, or any number of examples as with examples node. The "Typed Fragments" section unambiguously refers to Examples as being the "Relevant RAML Specification Section" for this type of fragment, however the description should be clarified.
The
NamedExample
fragment, being in the singular form, may lead to confusion as to whether it could be used to define a singular example as withexample
node, or any number of examples as withexamples
node. The "Typed Fragments" section unambiguously refers toExamples
as being the "Relevant RAML Specification Section" for this type of fragment, however the description should be clarified.Proposed changes
to: