This is to comply with RFC 7517, Section 4: "Additional members can be present in the JWK; if not understood by implementations encountering them, they MUST be ignored"
Some providers have keys with uses that don't apply to our use case, this change enables us to ignore them gracefully.
This is to comply with RFC 7517, Section 4: "Additional members can be present in the JWK; if not understood by implementations encountering them, they MUST be ignored"
Some providers have keys with uses that don't apply to our use case, this change enables us to ignore them gracefully.
This should fix #91 for the simple case.