Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Hm, this looks much better than disabling core dumping completely.
Original comment by euge...@google.com
on 23 Sep 2014 at 1:43
did you try ASAN_OPTIONS=unmap_shadow_on_exit=1 ?
Original comment by konstant...@gmail.com
on 23 Sep 2014 at 4:30
Regarding ASAN_OPTIONS=unmap_shadow_on_exit=1:
No, I did not previously try that. It's not listed on the Wiki page of known
flags <https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/Flags> and I did not
notice it while reading the libsanitizer source to implement the madvise patch.
However, now that you pointed it out, I tried it and it does not seem to do
what I want. I see that it is supported in both gcc-4.8 and gcc-4.9. To test
it, I used a program where main() calls abort(), to simulate a program which
dies due to failing an internal consistency check, as opposed to dying because
AddressSanitizer found a memory misuse. I compiled it with both gcc-4.8, which
uses the stock libsanitizer, and with gcc-4.9, which has my proof of concept
madvise patch applied.
When using the stock libsanitizer of gcc-4.8 with
ASAN_OPTIONS=unmap_shadow_on_exit=1,disable_core=0 ./abort48, the program goes
to 100% CPU in system mode and ultimately generates an apparently 14T core
(actual size per du: 3.4M). I also tried using a colon to separate the
options, with the same result. The core took about 2 minutes to write, despite
its effective very small size.
When using the locally patched libsanitizer of gcc-4.9 with
ASAN_OPTIONS=disable_core=0 ./abort49, the program dumps an apparently 48M core
(actual size per du: 2.4M) and exits almost instantly.
I also tried a test program which writes to *(int*)nullptr, to trigger an
AddressSanitizer trap. In that case, I needed to add abort_on_error=1,
otherwise no core file was generated after AddressSanitizer trapped the
SIGSEGV. This is a bit counterintuitive, since an unsanitized program would
have dumped core on a null pointer write, but an AddressSanitizer-instrumented
program requires both disable_core=0 *and* abort_on_error=1 to dump core on a
null pointer write. I expected abort_on_error=1 was only needed if I wanted to
abort on errors found specific to AddressSanitizer (redzone, malloc/delete
mismatch, etc.) and that regular errors were affected only by disable_core.
Using abort_on_error=1 here also generates a core file that is recorded as an
ABRT (gdb says "Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted."), which while
technically true, is misleading since the abort happened in response to a
SIGSEGV. The frame where the SIGSEGV happened seems to be well recorded, so
the core is still usable for debugging.
- Using ASAN_OPTIONS=disable_core=0 ./segv48, I get an AddressSanitizer report,
no core file, and immediate return to shell.
- Using ASAN_OPTIONS=disable_core=0:abort_on_error=1 ./segv48, I get the long
stall and 14T core file, returning to the shell after about 2 minutes.
- Using ASAN_OPTIONS=disable_core=0:unmap_shadow_on_exit=1 ./segv48, I get no
core file and an immediate return to shell.
- Using ASAN_OPTIONS=disable_core=0:abort_on_error=1:unmap_shadow_on_exit=1
./segv48, I get an abort and immediate small core file.
Thus, I understand what you were hoping to see when you suggested
unmap_shadow_on_exit=1, but it does not solve the problem fully, since it only
works on scenarios where AddressSanitizer triggered the abort, but not on
scenarios where the program called abort() on its own (nor scenarios with less
common core-generating signals, such as SIGQUIT). Marking the tables as
not-dumpable ensures that they are not written regardless of why the kernel
writes a core dump.
Original comment by google.8...@spamgourmet.com
on 24 Sep 2014 at 10:41
makes sense. Please send a patch to llvm-commits@ (see
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute)
Note that we do not #include system headers in asan_rtl.cc.
You will need to create a separate function similar to
FlushUnneededShadowMemory in
lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix_libcdep.cc
The change will also need a tests in test/asan/TestCases/Linux
Thanks for the detailed explanation!
Original comment by konstant...@gmail.com
on 24 Sep 2014 at 10:54
Can somebody please summarize whether here is something actionable for me to do
or not (I am assigned as the owner)?
Original comment by dvyu...@google.com
on 26 Sep 2014 at 2:16
Original comment by konstant...@gmail.com
on 26 Sep 2014 at 4:45
I am not a regular committer on llvm or gcc. I posted the original attachment
as a demonstration for how to implement the change, with the hope that it would
be useful for other one-off users and as a reference for whoever picks up the
change to merge it into libsanitizer. I do not expect to have enough free time
soon to complete all the steps required to merge the change.
Original comment by google.8...@spamgourmet.com
on 27 Sep 2014 at 12:42
I was wondering if we could do this for both asan and tsan and made this patch.
Would be great if someone could comment on it.
Original comment by nischay...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2014 at 10:12
Attachments:
Sure, the approach makes sense.
You are more than welcome to contribute the full patch:
- add a run-time flag use_madv_dontdump, on by default
- add a test which tests use_madv_dontdump=1, use_madv_dontdump=0, and default
Original comment by konstant...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2014 at 5:12
I've filed a patch for this at http://reviews.llvm.org/D7294
Original comment by tetra20...@gmail.com
on 30 Jan 2015 at 2:59
Adding Project:AddressSanitizer as part of GitHub migration.
Original comment by ramosian.glider@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2015 at 9:06
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
google.8...@spamgourmet.com
on 23 Sep 2014 at 3:00Attachments: