Open ramosian-glider opened 9 years ago
We use our own Printf, should be fine.
Reported by konstantin.s.serebryany
on 2012-02-13 15:48:49
WontFix
Still, this is very misleading and error prone. Using %lx, etc syntax makes people think
there is a printf() underneath.
I suggest we invent a new syntax for Printf format lines, so that no one will ever
confuse it with printf(). It can also have a specifier for decimal intptr_t/uintptr_t,
that normal printf() is lacking.
Reported by eugenis@google.com
on 2012-02-15 06:52:51
Accepted
Really, I see no problem. at all. And we have much more important things to care about.
Reported by konstantin.s.serebryany
on 2012-02-15 06:55:36
For short term mitigation, I suggest we replace all % with @.
Reported by eugenis@google.com
on 2012-02-15 06:57:14
I hope you are kidding.
Reported by konstantin.s.serebryany
on 2012-02-15 07:05:21
WontFix
http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml?showone=64-bit_Portability#64-bit_Portability
Reported by glider@chromium.org
on 2012-02-15 07:08:36
I kind of was :)
Per online discussion, I'm adding %zu/%zd to Printf.
Reported by eugenis@google.com
on 2012-02-15 07:16:09
Started
can this be closed? (or fixed and closed?)
Reported by konstantin.s.serebryany
on 2012-02-24 22:59:32
First fixed, then closed.
Reported by eugenis@google.com
on 2012-02-27 10:23:53
Ping. Please either fix or close.
Reported by konstantin.s.serebryany
on 2012-03-16 16:54:19
http://codereview.appspot.com/5856044/
Reported by eugenis@google.com
on 2012-03-20 11:00:26
Can this be marked as fixed already?
Reported by ramosian.glider
on 2012-04-18 10:23:52
Reported by eugenis@google.com
on 2012-04-18 10:46:16
Fixed
Adding Project:AddressSanitizer as part of GitHub migration.
Reported by ramosian.glider
on 2015-07-30 09:12:58
Originally reported on Google Code with ID 40
Reported by
eugenis@google.com
on 2012-02-13 13:02:45