pkgcheck results - develop

[github-actions[bot]]

Checks for snomedizer (v0.4.0)

git hash: d55a0283

• :heavy_check_mark: Package name is available
• :heavy_check_mark: has a 'codemeta.json' file.
• :heavy_check_mark: has a 'contributing' file.
• :heavy_check_mark: uses 'roxygen2'.
• :heavy_check_mark: 'DESCRIPTION' has a URL field.
• :heavy_check_mark: 'DESCRIPTION' has a BugReports field.
• :heavy_check_mark: Package has at least one HTML vignette
• :heavy_check_mark: All functions have examples.
• :heavy_check_mark: Package has continuous integration checks.
• :heavy_multiplication_x: Package coverage failed
• :heavy_multiplication_x: R CMD check found 1 error.
• :heavy_check_mark: R CMD check found no warnings.

Important: All failing checks above must be addressed prior to proceeding

Package License: MIT + file LICENSE

[github-actions[bot]]

Checks for snomedizer (v0.4.0)

git hash: a1b328c2

• :heavy_check_mark: Package name is available
• :heavy_check_mark: has a 'codemeta.json' file.
• :heavy_check_mark: has a 'contributing' file.
• :heavy_check_mark: uses 'roxygen2'.
• :heavy_check_mark: 'DESCRIPTION' has a URL field.
• :heavy_check_mark: 'DESCRIPTION' has a BugReports field.
• :heavy_check_mark: Package has at least one HTML vignette
• :heavy_check_mark: All functions have examples.
• :heavy_check_mark: Package has continuous integration checks.
• :heavy_multiplication_x: Package coverage failed
• :heavy_multiplication_x: R CMD check found 1 error.
• :heavy_check_mark: R CMD check found no warnings.

Important: All failing checks above must be addressed prior to proceeding

Package License: MIT + file LICENSE

[peterdutey]

Hi @AnikaC-git

I read through the report and here are some comments

• [x] replacement of sapply by vapply: OK makes plenty of sense
• [ ] Omit "Date" in DESCRIPTION - I prefer to actually keep it for now. I find it useful. Peer review can ask us to change that later
• [x] test.utils.R:11:3 is failing in pkgcheck. We can add the dutch server to the list so it not longer fails
• [ ] package coverage failing: this has to do with covr and I suspect we need to provide some kind of environment variable or API token to the pkgcheck yaml. It's working fine on the other pipeline so it's probably just a config issue.

Happy to discuss and split the work! Peter