With the new changes in https://github.com/aiyengar2/hull/pull/26 that allow for Checks that are parametrized according to the values.yaml of the Case it is running, it makes more sense to allow NamedChecks and FailureCases to identify what they seek to cover based on the field or named template they are targeting, not the place in which that field was found.
With the new changes in https://github.com/aiyengar2/hull/pull/26 that allow for Checks that are parametrized according to the
values.yamlof the Case it is running, it makes more sense to allow NamedChecks and FailureCases to identify what they seek to cover based on the field or named template they are targeting, not the place in which that field was found.This is a breaking change.