update oscar data based on imdb

[RikBoeykens]

Got data from imdb and added it in the same format. Enriched the data with extra information:

• _normalizedname holds the 'normalized' name of a category. Categories like 'Best Original Screenplay' can have different names ('Best Writing, Best Screenplay - Original', 'Best Writing, Original Screenplay', 'Best Writing, Original Story',...). The normalized name attempts to assign a more general name to these categories (could be used in the dropdown where you can choose categories)
• notes on a candidate hold extra information about this specific nomination (if available)
• _targetenriched has the same info as target, but instead of a single string it holds extra information like imdb id, image (if available) and a note (if available)

[RikBoeykens]

added some more stuff. Should probably put it in branches (especially the stuff with the pictures is quite disruptive. If you want a 'clean' pull request with just some of the changes, let me know!

[kyle-n]

Awesome, thank you! I have family visiting at the moment so I’ll try to review all the changes Sunday or next week.

[kyle-n]

This looks good! Can you split this up into different PRs? Maybe one for the new JSON file data source and then one for the UI redesign? Sorry, just a lot to wrap my head around.

I'm excited though, this data looks really good.

[RikBoeykens]

Created a new pr with just the json: https://github.com/randomoscars/randomoscars.github.io/pull/2

[RikBoeykens]

some other UI improvements: does it make sense to add an option to filter on the 'main' categories: picture, director, writing, acting? Seems to me they'd rather talk about Best Actor than Best Art Direction-Set Decoration. I can add a "is_main" flag to those categories, and then there can be a checkbox on the form so the randomizer filters on those, as well as the dropdown

[kyle-n]

@RikBoeykens An interesting idea but I think it's a touch too much UI and logic complexity. I'll look over this PR.

[kyle-n]

@RikBoeykens After playing around with some different layouts, I think the images make the design too busy. It's cool that we have them but I think they're too distracting from the nominee list. The names are the most important thing, since that's what will be referenced on a theoretical podcast.

I think let's keep the links but simplify to just text. Also, I tried some new formatting to highlight the winner of each category.

Let me know what you think of the new highlighting and text-only design.

[RikBoeykens]

looks good!

[RikBoeykens]

I ran it now, and putting the winners in white means that (on my desktop) they don't show up!

[kyle-n]

😬 Yikes, good catch