search

ransome1 / sleek

todo.txt manager for Linux, Windows and MacOS, free and open-source (FOSS)
https://github.com/ransome1/sleek/wiki
MIT License
1.33k stars 104 forks source link

AppImage not starting on Debian Sid #520

Closed Doc73 closed 11 months ago

Doc73 commented 11 months ago

Bug Report

App Version: sleek-1.3.1.AppImage

Platform: Debian Sid

Installation Method: Direct Download

Bug Description:

$ ./sleek-1.3.1.AppImage 
dlopen(): error loading libfuse.so.2

AppImages require FUSE to run. 
You might still be able to extract the contents of this AppImage 
if you run it with the --appimage-extract option. 
See https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/wiki/FUSE 
for more information

libfuse2 is still available in repos, but the default is libfuse3-3

Steps to Reproduce: See above

Expected Behavior: App starting

Actual Behavior: App doesn't start

System Information:

Reproducibility:

Impact:

ransome1 commented 11 months ago

Thanks for the report. Can I ask you to check the AppImage of the latest developer preview of v2.0? https://github.com/ransome1/sleek/releases/tag/v2.0.0-dev9

It's built based on significant newer dependencies. I'm curious if the issue occurs in the most recent release.

Doc73 commented 11 months ago

@ransome1 Same issue with v. 2.0

ransome1 commented 11 months ago

mmhh I dont know. But if it runs on Debian Stable and not on Sid, where it asks for FUSE to be required but not found, doesn't it indicate that there is something missing in Debian Sid? I wouldn't know how to fix this in sleek.

Doc73 commented 11 months ago

@ransome1 Yes, I think that it is missing libfuse2, replaced by libfuse3-3. libfuse2 is still available in Debian Sid repositories: https://packages.debian.org/it/sid/libfuse2

Here its history: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fuse

The question is: how long will it be available?

Doc73 commented 11 months ago

I did not tested v. 2.0 on Debian Stable, but it's not necessary: in Debian Stable both libfuse2 and libfuse3-3 are automatically installed.

Doc73 commented 11 months ago

Ok! This is not a bug strictly speaking.

I don't know if an AppImage can be build to work with fuse3. If so, consider what is best to do, otherwise, please close this bug report.

Many thanks in any case, Domenico

ransome1 commented 11 months ago

I'm not actively deploying FUSE so I assume it's a dependency Electron Builder (within my building pipeline this creates all the releases of sleek) use to build the AppImage. There is probably nothing I can actively do about it. But if anybody proves me wrong I'm happy to adjust sleek. But as for now I hope you understand I can't make research on this a priority for me. I'm happy to keep your report in the backlog though.

Doc73 commented 11 months ago

@ransome1 Yes, sure! I understand! In the meantime, I can confirm that installing libfuse2 solves everything. We'll see what the future holds for us. :smile:

ransome1 commented 11 months ago

@Doc73 shall we close here? I don't think there is anything I can do about it.

Doc73 commented 11 months ago

Yes! You can close this issue. If you want, you could add somewhere here the suggestion to install libfuse2. When one day libfuse2 will be completely missing from the repositories, well!... then we'll see whot to do! :smile: