Closed Stephen-Hao closed 3 years ago
Thanks for your interest in our paper.
We use the Pytorch implementation of WS-DAN from this repo. The performance is lower than the original paper (88.28 vs. 89.4). To better compare with SOTA methods like API-NET, we use a stronger backbone.
In our early experiments, we also found CAL can also improve WS-DAN based on Inception V3 (88.28 -> 89.32 on CUB).
@raoyongming 好的,可能是我没有仔细看论文,感谢您的解答。
WS-DAN 使用的主干网络是inceptionV3,而CAL使用的是resnet101,后者性能明显比前者好,为什么论文中在不同数据集上对比时,没用也使用inceptionV3呢