search

rapidsai / cuml

cuML - RAPIDS Machine Learning Library
https://docs.rapids.ai/api/cuml/stable/
Apache License 2.0
4.2k stars 525 forks source link

[FEA] Can anyone give me examples of using Forest Inference Library in c++ like DBScan and K Means clustering #1784

Open ravusairam opened 4 years ago

ravusairam commented 4 years ago

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I wish I could use cuML to do [...]

Describe the solution you'd like A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context Add any other context, code examples, or references to existing implementations about the feature request here.

cjnolet commented 4 years ago

cc @canonizer

ravusairam commented 4 years ago

@canonizer @cjnolet It would be great if somebody can point me to ML train and predict random forest using c++ API. I have tried to train and predict ( both using ML::predict and Forest inference library ) some how the correctness of the training and inference is not matching with our existing CPU code. I

ravusairam commented 4 years ago

@canonizer @cjnolet Also, apart from just predicted codes is there any plan to give feature importance and OOB scores?

teju85 commented 4 years ago

@ravusairam like we just discussed in our CWE breakout room, please file a separate issue for this one, so that this doesn't get lost.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 years ago

This issue has been labeled inactive-90d due to no recent activity in the past 90 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 years ago

This issue has been labeled inactive-30d due to no recent activity in the past 30 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed. This issue will be labeled inactive-90d if there is no activity in the next 60 days.