raspberrypi / linux

Kernel source tree for Raspberry Pi-provided kernel builds. Issues unrelated to the linux kernel should be posted on the community forum at https://forums.raspberrypi.com/
Other
11.17k stars 5.01k forks source link

Patch for CVE-2024-1086 not available in Bullseye stable (6.1.21) yet, kernel still vulnerable #6200

Open bcutter opened 5 months ago

bcutter commented 5 months ago

Describe the bug

Cause: CVE-2024-1086

Patch https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commit/8e34430e33b8a80bc014f3efe29cac76bc30a4b4 seems to not be merged to any stable release. Bullseye 6.1.21 dates back to 2023-04-03 and therefore is vulnerable. It has been patched already in original Debian release (see https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-1086), Raspberry Pi OS seems to stay behind.

Background: https://www-heise-de.translate.goog/news/Linux-Luecke-Angreifer-verschaffen-sich-root-Rechte-9742699.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Not sure if Raspberry Pi OS Bookworm release channel kernels are also still affected

Steps to reproduce the behaviour

Use Raspberry Pi OS with latest kernel.

Device (s)

Raspberry Pi 4 Mod. B

System

Raspberry Pi OS v11 (Bullseye)

Logs

No response

Additional context

https://github.com/Notselwyn/CVE-2024-1086

popcornmix commented 5 months ago

I've bumped the 6.1 tree to latest upstream stable, which does include the referenced commit. I've built a candidate kernel which can be got with: sudo rpi-update oldstable

If you could test this, it would be helpful.

We'll update the apt kernel if no regressions are reported in this test kernel.

bcutter commented 5 months ago

Great, thanks.

Unfortunately as a passionate user I don‘t do rpi-update anymore - strictly on my productive systems. I only have one test system (Pi 2 B, 32 bit OS) left. I can test it there but as it is not used productively my feedback would likely be limited to „boots, runs, no issues discovered so far“.

Let me know if that’s helpful at all or sufficient.

pelwell commented 5 months ago

as a passionate user I don‘t do rpi-update anymore

Passion usually leads to a lack of caution...

popcornmix commented 5 months ago

Let me know if that’s helpful at all or sufficient.

Any testing is better than no testing, so go ahead.

bcutter commented 5 months ago

as a passionate user I don‘t do rpi-update anymore

Passion usually leads to a lack of caution...

😁

Maybe a bit lost in translation. The focus is on "user" not the adjective in front of it. Spent 2 whole weekends recently with Pi system mgmt stuff (OS maintenance and kernel things) so indeed the lack of free time equals the lack of passion currently.

In general I was a bit surprised this has not been fixed (shipped) yet while all security magazines are talking bout this CVE and it has been fixed in most distributions even for months.

How to downgrade / revert the rpi-update just in case? If I remind correctly that never was possible (bleeding edge/beta back to stable).

popcornmix commented 5 months ago

sudo apt install --reinstall raspberrypi-kernel should revert back to current apt kernel on bullseye.

bcutter commented 5 months ago

Update not performed yet, because: Is this correct? "bumps to rpi-5.10.y linux tree" is a bit confusing:

grafik

Also the referenced forums article (https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=288234) is about the old 5.10 tree.

pelwell commented 5 months ago

That's a human-written comment that, quite reasonably, hasn't been updated for this trial build.

popcornmix commented 5 months ago

I have now updated the notice file (so the message will change), but you'll actually get the 6.1 kernel either way.

bcutter commented 5 months ago

Looking better now, including some more helpful details on firmware/bootloader versions:

grafik

...even the information bout the eeprom firmware also confuses a bit. Is it "too old" because it is Bullseye or because it's not a Pi 4 upwards hardware and therefore doesn't even have an eeprom?


sudo rpi-update oldstable on a test system (Pi 2 B hardware):

Well, it booted fine so... nothing to complain I guess. As mentioned: test system. I only noticed by the way that the former kernel files (6.1.21*) in /lib/modules remained (expected them to get removed, but maybe that's only done with apt packages and rpi-update behaves different).

bcutter commented 4 months ago

Still running/working.

Status/progress? Enough testing/confidence to release it or...?