Open chasinglogic opened 7 years ago
should we use the regex for this or only support swapping argv[0] like bash does? @lionize
I think we should go down the argv0 route like bash. It seems like it would be safer.
I'm leaning towards argv[0], but that's also probably because it's what I'm familiar with. What would be gained from going the regex route, and would it be worth the added complexity to the end user?
For now let's use argv[0] and reassess later
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:32 PM, Mark Chandler notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm leaning towards argv[0], but that's also probably because it's what I'm familiar with. What would be gained from going the regex route, and would it be worth the added complexity to the end user?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rustic-shell/rsh/issues/4#issuecomment-277418282, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFRkD-p5q2CstJrM9cCjPVzeNLMIigVoks5rY_9zgaJpZM4LxhHp .
Obviously we should support aliases