Closed joshka closed 3 weeks ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 94.2%. Comparing base (
e6871b9
) to head (bde0bf4
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Given that the terminals are reexported, should this be reexported too (when the feature flag is given)?
Given that the terminals are reexported, should this be reexported too (when the feature flag is given)?
There's no public code to export - just trait impls.
Given that the terminals are reexported, should this be reexported too (when the feature flag is given)?
There's no public code to export - just trait impls.
Srgb
for example? Currently, this feature needs to be enabled and palette be added as dependency to your crate to use it?
Given that the terminals are reexported, should this be reexported too (when the feature flag is given)?
There's no public code to export - just trait impls.
Srgb
for example? Currently, this feature needs to be enabled and palette be added as dependency to your crate to use it?
Ah, gotcha. I'd expect that the only people wanting to turn this on are probably people that are specifically using palette already. Also we have a palette module already (so this could easily cause confusion).
This is behind the "palette" feature flag.