Closed JSKenyon closed 3 years ago
There are still some question marks as regards testing - if I do not zero the off-diagonal components of the model, I cannot get precise agreement between the solved and true gains. This is particularly bizarre as the residuals are at the 1e-15 level. This suggests that I may be failing to compare the gains correctly, specifically in the 2x2 case.
There are still some question marks as regards testing - if I do not zero the off-diagonal components of the model, I cannot get precise agreement between the solved and true gains. This is particularly bizarre as the residuals are at the 1e-15 level. This suggests that I may be failing to compare the gains correctly, specifically in the 2x2 case.
I have fixed this and updated the PR.
This PR adds a
(gain).solve_per
option which must be either"antenna"
or"array"
. All solvers now understand this parameter and can produce an appropriate gain term (which is still fully compatible with the rest of the chain) .