Closed piotrostr closed 2 months ago
this might require some more work but I got it makes the deserialization of the given liquidity pool data yield the right values
There is no need to update.Please use the new version layout..
@RainRaydium you mean the Raydium V3 that is in beta? https://beta.raydium.io/
I was targeting the current Raydium LP program (675kPX9MHTjS2zt1qfr1NYHuzeLXfQM9H24wFSUt1Mp8
)
this could be documented somewhere since the examples provided in the https://github.com/raydium-io/raydium-library client are not working out-of-the-box
new version layout
what do you mean, @RainRaydium? LIQUIDITY_STATE_LAYOUT_V5
? https://github.com/raydium-io/raydium-library/blob/master/client/src/main.rs#L204-L205
I sort of don't believe that the example from https://github.com/raydium-io/raydium-library/blob/master/client/src/main.rs#L204-L205 just doesn't work. What am I doing wrong? 🤔
The alignment of swap_pc_in_amount
doesn't seem to match the on-chain data from that pool id:
Rust assumes the offset of swap_pc_in_amount
inside StateData
is 0x70, but it seems to be 0x68 on chain. I've tried different Rust versions from 1.73 to 1.79 on an M2 MacBook and in the official rust:1.x.0-slim
Docker containers.
The TS example from https://github.com/raydium-io/raydium-sdk-V2-demo/blob/master/src/amm/swap.ts works.
Did you understand that answer, @piotrostr ? Is there a pool where the example from raydium-library works out of the box? The V3 UI transactions seem to be calling routeUGWgWzqBWFcrCfv8tritsqukccJPu3q5GPP3xS
, which interacts with that same 675kPX9MHTjS2zt1qfr1NYHuzeLXfQM9H24wFSUt1Mp8
, e.g. https://solscan.io/tx/4jpWim3DejJobmP7PXnHqQB3yvV6CGkzkbcLABhRULekFhR74e97qVCGgSmNPyNJ1mCwyeCVDpBSNcCdFhefMpkJ 🤔
this might require some more work but I got it makes the deserialization of the given liquidity pool data yield the right values