Open raynamharris opened 5 years ago
Unbiased part 1 and 2. PCA analysis of yoked and home cage animals, looking at CA1, CA3 and DG subfields of the hippocampus. Each circle, square, or triangle represents a unique tissue sample from one mouse.
Here are a few figures that compare how training differs from yoked in each sub-region (point 3) and how “one memory” differs from “two memories” in each subregion (point 4).
This table-like figure shows how many genes are differentially expressed between any two treatments. I look at all the data together (top left) and by subregion. The DG specific pattern mirrors the overall pattern. Not much happens in CA3. Most differences are between home cage and everything else.
This heat map of all the samples with highly significant genes in rows shows that DG is almost, but not quite, divided into trained versus yoked and home cage.
If you don't separate by brain region these are the strongest treatment effects. Yes, those are white dots for home cage... i need a new color scheme
For point 6, pkmz hasn't shown up in the past, but I do need to include home cage samples and rerun this for other genes, perhaps in a subfield specific manner.
Here's yet one more way to look at which groups are most different. a correlation matrix across group average gene expression
Start with an “unbiased” (data-driven) approach. Then move to “biased" (hypothesis-driven) analyses.