raysan5 / raygui

A simple and easy-to-use immediate-mode gui library
zlib License
3.45k stars 296 forks source link

`GuiToggle()` always returns 0 #371

Closed SirNate0 closed 5 months ago

SirNate0 commented 8 months ago

https://github.com/raysan5/raygui/blob/45e7f967e62088b9fec02ac38c07d4b67d6466b0/src/raygui.h#L2025-L2071

Not sure if it's a bug or not. The documentation seems to have changed from the version used with the raylib-python-cffi, but those docs made it seem like it should return true when active.

Anut-py commented 8 months ago

raylib-python-cffi is probably out of date. All the controls were changed to return ints as status values (i.e. 1 or 0). In this case the status value is always 0. You should use active to get the toggle state.

Anut-py commented 8 months ago

Actually this does seem inconsistent; GuiMessageBox for example returns the clicked index instead of using a pointer. Maybe this needs to be redesigned to be more consistent.

raysan5 commented 8 months ago

@SirNate0 @Anut-py Latest raygui 4.0 release was a big redesign of the library moving all controls data from return values to function parameters and return values were left for internal control states values required by users. This is still under design trying to find a common pattern for all controls on what kind of info should be returned (i.e. Mouse states over control, focus state, specific required states to be exposed...)

Help and feedback on this improvements are welcome!

furudbat commented 8 months ago

@SirNate0 @Anut-py Latest raygui 4.0 release was a big redesign of the library moving all controls data from return values to function parameters and return values were left for internal control states values required by users. This is still under design trying to find a common pattern for all controls on what kind of info should be returned (i.e. Mouse states over control, focus state, specific required states to be exposed...)

Help and feedback on this improvements are welcome!

I also noticed this, (in the old behavior it was something like this "return 1 when clicked", the newer version broke some code of mine)

Would be nice if the Gui-Elements returns 1 when clicked or interact with, some sort of "onChange"-Event.

they are also "render-only" Gui-Elements with int as result. (like GuiGroupBox, GuiLabel, ...) those can also return 1 when clicked, maybe enable this feature via macro (?)

For GuiToggle, it can return 1 when clicked:

        // Check toggle button state
        if (CheckCollisionPointRec(mousePoint, bounds))
        {
            if (IsMouseButtonDown(MOUSE_LEFT_BUTTON))
            {
                state = STATE_PRESSED;
                result = 1;
            }
            else if (IsMouseButtonReleased(MOUSE_LEFT_BUTTON))
            {
                state = STATE_NORMAL;
                *active = !(*active);
                result = 1;
            }
            else state = STATE_FOCUSED;
        }

For something like GuiToggleGroup, it can be "number of GuiToggle interact": result += GuiToggle(bounds, items[i], &toggle); .

If some value changed or the user interact with the Gui-Element, I can do something like this:

if(GuiButton(...)) { ... }

if (GuiToggle(...)) {
    // do stuff with change toggle value
}
if (GuiTextBox(...)) {
}

// some special cases ...
if (GuiDropdownBox(....)) {
    case 1:
    // item got selected (clicked)
    break;
    case 2:
    // clicked out-of-box, "close" DropdownBox
    break;
}

I'm sure enums can help as results:

typedef enum {
    TEXTBOX_CLICKED = 1
} GuiTextBoxResult;
raysan5 commented 7 months ago

@furudbat Thanks for the review! Actually, I would like to find a consistent convention between all controls in that regards.

For example:

typedef enum GuiControlResult {
    RESULT_NONE = 0,
    RESULT_FOCUSED = 1,
    RESULT_CLICKED = 2,
    RESULT_SCROLLED = 3,
    RESULT_CUSTOM01 = 4,
    RESULT_CUSTOM02 = 5,
} GuiControlResult;

But every control has to be carefully analized to see what are the possible internal states that could be returned. It would be nice to unify the possible return values but also allow per-control custom return values.

Your controls list with a potential return state is a good start.

raysan5 commented 5 months ago

Opened a separate issue to review.