Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Can't reproduce.
However discovered another bug when adding a new condition, it has empty data.
Original comment by zila...@gmail.com
on 9 Mar 2013 at 10:41
Arthmoor: Can you tell me which plugin and which conditions you were editing ?
On my first test for issue 125 I got a "glitch" thant I could not reproduce
after. It may have been similar to your issue.
Original comment by HuguesLe...@gmail.com
on 9 Mar 2013 at 3:15
It was in the USKP. I was trying to add a new condition to one of the Deep
Wounds perks to correct a conflict between it and Dragonborn.
I can't reproduce the error now, which suggests I was doing something really
wrong. I hate it when stuff like this happens. I *KNEW* I should have
screenshot it :P
I am getting the error you have screenshots for in 125 though. The one with the
"error, expecting x bytes" thing. That went away when I dragged the condition I
needed over to the field though.
Original comment by arthmoor
on 10 Mar 2013 at 10:49
Er, in the UDBP (dragonborn patch) actually. Ugh. Too many acronyms.
Original comment by arthmoor
on 10 Mar 2013 at 10:49
arthmoor: Can you reproduce it with 3.0.29 ?
Original comment by HuguesLe...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2013 at 2:15
No I can't. Perhaps it was just an inconsistent subrecords alignment I
described in issue 125. The first time I encountered it, my initial thought was
"something wrong here", but it is just how it works actually.
Original comment by zila...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2013 at 2:55
I know you asked Arthmoor, but I tried several times to reproduce anything
weird with 3.0.29.
Original comment by zila...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2013 at 2:56
So you both agree, we can close ?
Original comment by HuguesLe...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2013 at 3:19
Let's wait for Arthmoor first :)
Original comment by zila...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2013 at 3:59
Haven't been able to repo it again. Knowing our luck though it'll show up next
week or something. If it does, I'll grab screenshots. Until then, may as well
close this.
Original comment by arthmoor
on 20 Mar 2013 at 2:40
Could not be reproduced
Original comment by HuguesLe...@gmail.com
on 20 Mar 2013 at 8:29
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
arthmoor
on 9 Mar 2013 at 2:08