Open etas-lorenz opened 13 years ago
So I have been reading about rp1210's and I agree that we should support it. But can we expect the definition to change in the next couple of years with the development of new technology?
Standards always evolve. RP1210 is already available in versions A and B. I've already seen proposals for version C. To my understanding this is upward compatible.
The same is true for J2534-1 and J2534-2.
So we are not braking anything if we now implement the current standards rather than waiting for updates.
Did this actually get implemented? Meaning, can I use a off the shelf J2534 interface with this application? J2534 is pretty generic between hardware, should be somewhat straight forward. Cheers
Any update on this issue?
Thanks.
I would like to attempt to implement the RP1210B but need some preliminary guidance.
I think its a good idea to support RP1210 device
There are at least three similar or extending standards defining a standardized D-PDU API to access Vehicle Communication Interfaces (VCI):
There are already multiple products out there in the market including some products from ETAS. We should support this.