rbicelli / pfsense-zabbix-template

Zabbix Template for pfSense
Apache License 2.0
238 stars 107 forks source link

Monitoring Table Usage Count #158

Closed GuillaumeHullin closed 4 months ago

GuillaumeHullin commented 7 months ago

This is not an issue but an idea.

I encountered a problem with my pfSense recently, where my table-entries hard limit was too low. In the GUI it's under "Firewall Maximum Table Entries" (https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/config/advanced-firewall-nat.html)

I was wondering if we could monitor the two items:

The trigger would be "Firewall Maximum Table Entries is too low" when Table Usage Count is more than half Maximum Table Entries.

The only place I could find the Table Usage Count is in the Update of pfBlocker (at the end).

pfSense Table Stats
-------------------
table-entries hard limit  2000000
Table Usage Count         420743

Anybody have an idea which command to use?

rbicelli commented 7 months ago

Hi! I think is easy to implement with pfctl command:

pfctl -sm
states        hard limit   809000
src-nodes     hard limit   809000
frags         hard limit     5000
table-entries hard limit  1200000

Check https://www.openbsdhandbook.com/pf/cheat_sheet/

rbicelli commented 7 months ago

For example, for table usage, the syntax could be:

pfctl -s info | grep "current entries" | tr -s ' ' | cut -d " " -f4
GuillaumeHullin commented 7 months ago

For example, for table usage, the syntax could be:

pfctl -s info | grep "current entries" | tr -s ' ' | cut -d " " -f4

Correct me if I'm wrong but this is the state table.

I went through the link you sent (btw, now I know what "pf" means in the name pfSense)

Is this command make a logical result for you?

pfctl -vvsTables | grep 'Addresses:   ' | awk '{sum += $2} END {print sum}'
rbicelli commented 7 months ago

Looks like that

pfctl -s info | grep "current entries" | tr -s ' ' | cut -d " " -f4

Outputs a value closer to this: immagine

pfctl -vvsTables | grep 'Addresses:   ' | awk '{sum += $2} END {print sum}'

outputs a value way higher than what is displayed in GUI (in my case 17281).

rbicelli commented 7 months ago

Sorry, I read with more attention what you wrote. You want to monitor not only the state table but the whole table usage, so your one-liner return more meaningful value.