Updated bh_player_healthcross_inset.res and README links.

[PeanutKarver]

Updated bh_player_healthcross_inset.res for better visuals. Health cross background, overheal, and status effects align better with the health cross. Added pictures for a before and after comparison.

Before health cross background alignment change: After health cross background alignment change:

Before status effect alignment change: After status effect alignment change: The status effects are misaligned to the health cross in the base game too, so you don't necessarily have to change this part.

Before overheal alignment change (Full overheal): After overheal alignment change (Full overheal):

Before overheal alignment change (Minimum overheal): After overheal alignment change (Minimum overheal): The overheal changes were made specifically for minimum overheal. The larger image while fully overhealed is an unintended side-effect, but that should be fine.

I also tried updating some of the README links. Not sure if they're the right links, but I tried. I did that part on a whim.

[rbjaxter]

This looks good to me, and very thorough which I appreciate :) I can check this on my end, but did you happen to check it on another aspect ratio + resolution?

[rbjaxter]

I'll just check and correct if any issues, thanks for fixing this!

[PeanutKarver]

Hey, sorry for the late reply. I know this closed, but I don't know where else to post this. I checked a few resolutions, and I noticed there were few problems I'd like to elaborate on. For reference, every image has addcond 58; addcond 59; addcond 60; addcond 48; addcond 30; addcond 93 enabled for a total of 6 status effects.

1600x900 (16:9)

1280x720 (16:9)

1280x800 (16:10)

720x480 (16:10)

800x600 (4:3)

640x480 (4:3)

640x480 (4:3) Old version

Firstly, the overheal and background health cross images have differing levels of quality, but I assume that's to be expected. However, I'd like to point out that the old image might have been created with the intent of being viewed in a 640x480 resolution. In that respect, it actually looks better than the new one I proposed in 4:3 resolutions (excluding at least 800x600 and 1152x864). It also has the benefit of looking similar to the default with its overheal. (I added 2 images for the old version, one with and without overheal, so that it's easier to spot the difference in overheal image)

Also, I didn't notice this at first, but the new change separates it from having the near identical likeness as bh_player_m0re_healthcross_inset.res and the original m0rehud hudplayerhealth_cross_team.res.

When I originally made the change to bh_healthcross_inset.res, I created it under a 1600x900 resolution and without knowing that it had ties to different files. In a way, it might be better to revert the changes to bh_player_healthcross_inset.res if you prefer what the older one had in comparison to the new one, and I can just keep the change for myself. If you like it though, let me know if you want me to change bh_player_m0re_healthcross_inset.res to match the new change, and maybe I can create a pull request to m0rehud so that it's all uniform.

Second, there's a problem with the status effect images shifting depending on how low the game's resolution is set to. I checked, and this seems to be a problem with all hudplayerhealth.res files, including hudplayerhealth_cross_team.res in m0rehud and in the default hud. I'm not sure if there's anything to be done about it, but if you want to look into a fix, it seems like m0rehud is more resistant to the change. At least, for the first status effect.

1600x900 to 640x480

Since I was looking into mostly all the hudplayerhealth.res files in budhud to check if the status effect issue wasn't specific to bh_healthcross_inset.res, I noticed that all the ones I checked have their status effects a bit misaligned with the health in a 1600x900 resolution.

I could fix all of them, but I'd like to know what resolution budhud was originally created for. They're all a little to the left, so I get the feeling that it may be on purpose and something I shouldn't touch.

Lastly, while looking into all of this, I noticed that budhud shows up to a maximum of 3 status effects on a 1600x900 resolution. That's exactly how the default hud handles it, but on lower resolutions it starts to clip too early. I can fix it so that a monitor displays as many as it physically can by increasing the HudPlayerHealth wide property, but since it only extends the area right and the status effects are displayed right-to-left, it would require every hudplayerhealth.res to change their positioning. I'd like to know your opinion on whether or not you'd like a sizeable change like that. I also cannot ensure I can provide support to ultra-wide monitors, since my monitor only goes up to 1600x900 and anything outside of that is outside of my ability. If you don't want a change like that, I'd like to note that bh_player_healthcross.res and bh_player_m0re_healthcross.res have the clipping issue without applying a lower resolution.

1600x900

I think that's about it. Again, sorry for the late reply. It took a while to look into everything and make this write-up.

P.S. Since you're accepting visual changes like this, you should technically update budhud's imgur gallery. I don't imagine that's one of your top priorities, but I thought I'd add this just in case.