When working on Transcription, I found that the RBMS PS had some instructions re: dedications at RBMS PS 2.3.4.1 that are no longer present in DCRMR. (The RBMS PS instructions for transcription had a reference to the instructions at 2.3.4.1.)
Michelle provided the following context:
The DCRM Steering Group (body that was reconciling differences between the different DCRM modules) discussed in 2014 some changes to treat dedications due to recommendations brought up by Cartographics. Ultimately, Cartographics was granted a format exception to record grammatically inseparable dedications in a note versus other title information.
When future DCRM manuals are incorporated with DCRMR, the instructions for dedications in the RBMS PS will likely need to be re-visited/re-integrated.
Note: This issue was originally posted by @rarebkcat on 22 September 2020 as a comment on issue #36, which was created as a catch-all for issues related to future development. For ease of tracking, the comments have been moved to their own individual issues and tagged as "future work."
DCMR(C) - Dedications
When working on Transcription, I found that the RBMS PS had some instructions re: dedications at RBMS PS 2.3.4.1 that are no longer present in DCRMR. (The RBMS PS instructions for transcription had a reference to the instructions at 2.3.4.1.)
Michelle provided the following context:
When future DCRM manuals are incorporated with DCRMR, the instructions for dedications in the RBMS PS will likely need to be re-visited/re-integrated.
Note: This issue was originally posted by @rarebkcat on 22 September 2020 as a comment on issue #36, which was created as a catch-all for issues related to future development. For ease of tracking, the comments have been moved to their own individual issues and tagged as "future work."