Time tracker vs. assigned Space

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. With Time Tracker open, assign it to a particular Space, say 8.
2. Quit Time Tracker
3. Move to another Space, say 7.
4. Open Time Tracker.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected: Time Tracker opens in Space 8, then Space 8 becomes the active Space.
Actual: Time Tracker opens in Space 7, then Space 8 becomes the active Space.

So... Time Tracker ignores the assigned space for opening its window.

What version of the product are you using? 

1.3.10

On what operating system?  Intel or PPC computer?

Mac OS X 10.6.4 on a Intel Core 2 Duo (an older Mac Mini)

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by louab...@gmail.com on 26 Oct 2010 at 3:01

[GoogleCodeExporter]

fixed in 1.3.11

Original comment by rbur...@gmail.com on 5 Nov 2010 at 9:15

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

damn, that didnt fix the problem, still investigating

Original comment by rbur...@gmail.com on 5 Nov 2010 at 10:38

• Changed state: Started

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by rbur...@gmail.com on 5 Nov 2010 at 10:38

• Added labels: Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Issue 93 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by rbur...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2010 at 7:09

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This is a major pain for me. I already tried a bunch of things, currently 
without success. Trouble is that I inherited the code so there might be 
something very basic in the project setup which could cause this. Newer Mac 
apps (if I create them with XCode) dont show this problem, therefore it must be 
something like that. Unfortunately the only way to fix this is (without being 
able to spot the exact problem) would be to start from a blank new project 
(which I might end up doing at some point). However, that would probably take 
more time than I can currently spare. 

Original comment by rbur...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2010 at 7:09

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Issue 105 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by rbur...@gmail.com on 7 Feb 2011 at 7:24