Open rbwhitaker opened 1 year ago
After thinking about this one a bit, I don't feel I can justify adding in an explanation while keeping to a "patch" update. It would require too much content and shift things around too much.
Furthermore, I also keep thinking on the idea that maybe E
doesn't even need to be covered in the book. I already don't cover everything provided by Math
, and not that many people are going to put E
to good use. PI
, on the other hand, is a lot more immediately useful.
The comment was that it is not obvious when you'd use
E
, and the book doesn't explain it. That much is true, but this might be something best deferred to a later version. The people who are likely to useE
probably know exactly where they'd use it, and the ones that don't probably don't care.This does beg the question, does
E
even need to be covered in this book?