Open cbfx opened 11 years ago
Thoughts? Icons are coming from http://www.somerandomdude.com/work/iconic/ for the interest of time. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/)
If we need to design custom icons, I'd be happy to. Just need to indicate what they should be.
I dig. Small. Simple.
These look good. Any concern about the "connected to" being red instead green? Or does that keep better with the overall theme?
Jason
On Feb 13, 2013, at 11:24 PM, Chris Burrell wrote:
Icon design thoughts
Roush Agent:
Thoughts?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/rcbops/ntrapy/issues/31#issuecomment-13533731.
Jason, These icons aren't really aiming to provide a status of something but rather a label color. I could understand how a red color mixed with a lightning bolt (which sometimes is attributed to connectivity) could definitely be misleading. Good catch.
Here's a preview to how the nodes and containers might look with the icons attached. The icons aren't relevant to what they're on so know that they shouldn't make much sense at the moment. Should we limit the icons to the most meaningful few? (we'll know it's a node or a container just by looking at it, etc)
We want to be able to visually distinguish what kind of nodes we have by use of custom icons.