Open jcreswell opened 3 years ago
Although the Latin is mostly classical, still some corruptions are found. They do not necessarily need to be corrected.
https://github.com/rcw5890/bochus/blob/b77c3e292dfdfa000094f9d2a53696fb8b26a0e0/books/jocelin_cronica/main.tex#L607
"preest" would be "praeest".
https://github.com/rcw5890/bochus/blob/b77c3e292dfdfa000094f9d2a53696fb8b26a0e0/books/jocelin_cronica/main.tex#L486
"nunciaret" and "nunciantes"
https://github.com/rcw5890/bochus/blob/b77c3e292dfdfa000094f9d2a53696fb8b26a0e0/books/jocelin_cronica/main.tex#L1000
"nuncians"
https://github.com/rcw5890/bochus/blob/b77c3e292dfdfa000094f9d2a53696fb8b26a0e0/books/jocelin_cronica/main.tex#L475
"nichil". But the classical spelling "nihil" is found elsewhere:
https://github.com/rcw5890/bochus/blob/b77c3e292dfdfa000094f9d2a53696fb8b26a0e0/books/jocelin_cronica/main.tex#L597
Both classical "ceter" and medieval "cæter" are found throughout, apparently randomly.
Although the Latin is mostly classical, still some corruptions are found. They do not necessarily need to be corrected.