Closed dckc closed 4 years ago
... those wishing to have access to REV on the RChain network should make sure that their RHOCs are in an address for which they control the private key.
The 3rd column of wallets.txt
is 1 when the address is an ethereum contract rather than a plain account with a key pair.
For example, the 2nd one is the coop Current operation account, according to RChain RHOC Distribution
p.s. See also note regarding coop multisig
$ # select * from wallets where contract=1 order by balance desc
$ grep ,1$ wallets.txt |sort -nr -k2 -t,
0x1c73D4Ff97b9c8299F55D3b757B70979Ee718754,27466403837716800,1
0xd35a2d8c651F3eba4F0a044DB961b5B0CCf68a2d,7793221780308682,1
0x287550958BE9D74d7f7152C911BA0b71801153A8,3117693198495265,1
0xf15230Cba5B211B7Cb6A4ae7cFc5a84e9cb6865d,1420881000000000,1
0x821aA521Ecba3f4fdef89cBe1F468636e858d90d,400000000000000,1
0x8d12A197cB00D4747a1fe03395095ce2A5CC6819,123888875532825,1
0x2a0c0DBEcC7E4D658f48E01e3fA353F44050c208,33542049164080,1
0xFCb733335456AACB010b3ba2f6270C83E849eCC3,23055366800000,1
0x168296bb09e24A88805CB9c33356536B980D3fC5,1374504267036,1
0x097D850094aF2d8b50C099414fc0953AeeFe5022,802059300000,1
0x9a2d163aB40F88C625Fd475e807Bbc3556566f80,709000000000,1
0x1cE7AE555139c5EF5A57CC8d814a867ee6Ee33D8,625736445456,1
0x38c6A68304cdEfb9BEc48BbFaABA5C5B47818bb2,500000000000,1
0x21738172D0C17Fb5041AB5d7fe9B84914164482A,400000000000,1
0x2af47a65da8CD66729b4209C22017d6A5C2d2400,200000000000,1
0x85C5c26DC2aF5546341Fc1988B9d178148b4838B,97442948585,1
0x04F062809B244e37e7fDC21D9409469c989C2342,28089142976,1
0xF4342c8C8252c23C13E5Ce56EA51d9F24Ecf9012,10000000000,1
0xcf25EbD54120cF2e4137Fab0A91a7f7403A5DEbF,2992750000,1
0x8ab7fdE4B32e9Bd66734e550A145aeB12822681D,1500000000,1
0x394e524b47A3AB3D3327f7fF6629dC378c1494a3,851202141,1
0xbF45F4280Cfbe7C2D2515A7D984B8c71c15E82B7,492105856,1
0xCB60D600160D005845Ec999f64266D5608fd8943,334000000,1
0xb92102B5C12a1Bc4774ff53d720CB1660a842b94,200000000,1
0xbF29685856FAE1e228878DFB35B280C0adCC3B05,113911827,1
0xf8700dFfaBaC07A280069419298545387B4D5357,100000000,1
0xB5ed18405949DB4aBC029077533115f63D80996f,6076000,1
0x4D71b91D46fA7247870804601E53AD9330CC7dCe,1190622,1
0xdC36CbE88eFD1b4Ef5cDcdbe74f0B28cd1e23D12,920000,1
0x14a4617C7A95046546541973797e44df7770f837,900000,1
0x980cAe4F2C7301D1D23FC709C379657C90D27D52,666833,1
0x6Ab7b546C392f62a8E1c4d483241FF605369f4de,600000,1
0x6924d3ad691E7F641FFe1c95aa6297e4C10e5e86,278000,1
0xd52Bc4fE5DA20BA35f25b38581c805B165211f99,237857,1
0x82da82DBe384736e4Dd95615D8036Cc472773F5A,200001,1
0xB4bCCD6095D9C0fbDf93c06c260384fb76c41ef5,199214,1
0x409B512e1cf94500877C5353B2a0C13B2d24914F,89787,1
0xbAd7653bc486c44FBeafa23FdEd6b3F3112D321C,6000,1
0x8018280076d7fA2cAa1147e441352E8a89e1DDbe,1,1
not a (multisig) contract. I got the addresses from @ysgjay in an RChain telegram channel
~/projects/rhoc-balance-reporter$ grep -i 0x2b5634c42055806a59e9107ed44d43c426e58258 wallets.txt
0x2B5634C42055806a59e9107ED44D43c426E58258,435380935559725,0
~/projects/rhoc-balance-reporter$ grep 0x2B5634C42055806a59e9107ED44D43c426E58258 wallets.txt
0x2B5634C42055806a59e9107ED44D43c426E58258,435380935559725,0
etherscan API projects block 9371743 will arrive at this time
I put the balances into a SQL table you can play with: https://repl.it/join/mujzsfzg-dckc
@dckc it seems you've sorted the result. Could you please publish unsorted version? By default addresses are added in order they first appear in a transfer.
OK, I ran it again to get unsorted results:
rhoc-balance-reporter$ sha256sum wallets_9371743.txt
308fce89369188e68873412c6e60b9c8481bd57e76fb9cc89d23458fa79105de wallets_9371743.txt
rhoc-balance-reporter$ sha1sum wallets_9371743.txt
2e089d38d48b18f48fb969f34ae247ff7f4e0ca9 wallets_9371743.txt
OK, I ran it again to get unsorted results:
rhoc-balance-reporter$ sha256sum wallets_9371743.txt 308fce89369188e68873412c6e60b9c8481bd57e76fb9cc89d23458fa79105de wallets_9371743.txt rhoc-balance-reporter$ sha1sum wallets_9371743.txt 2e089d38d48b18f48fb969f34ae247ff7f4e0ca9 wallets_9371743.txt
I can confirm thats the same balance file I get when querying the bc with the given tool.
[pi@pi rhoc-balance-reporter]$ sha256sum wallets.txt 308fce89369188e68873412c6e60b9c8481bd57e76fb9cc89d23458fa79105de wallets.txt
Sanity check: TotalSupply = 1 billion Rhoc Sum over all balances = 10^17 Rhoc contract specifies 8 decimals => SumOfAllBalances = 10^(17-8) Rhoc=10^9 Rhoc = 1 billion Rhoc = TotalSupply
This matches the expected total supply.
mainnet launched.
https://github.com/rchain/rchain/commit/cf10e26f537e516fb3ebcb5e9b9d77f1e0b907f0#diff-14230f61bd79457f34c0e11b9f121f6a (I note a couple edits since then; hmm...) https://discordapp.com/channels/375365542359465989/454113117257859073/678444912827432969 my own endorsement of wallets.txt cf10e26 https://github.com/dckc/rbalance/blob/check_rev/TEST.rst 4b608c0 my audit
The coop announced the block height at which RHOC balances will be transfered to the RChain genesis block and become REV balances:
Balances as of block 9371743
wallets_9371743.txt sha1sum:
2e089d38d48b18f48fb969f34ae247ff7f4e0ca9
That was generated using rchain/rhoc-balance-reporter 7a54a41 Aug 15 2019.
I did a preview run with
BLOCK=9345273
. The result is: wallets.txtIs RHOC in MEW Safe? (yes, assuming...)
If MEW shows an address that is in
wallets.txt
, then yes, it's safe, providedSee also
Is a Ledger hardware wallet safe? (yes, assuming...)
If the wallet you use with your Ledger shows an address in
wallets.txt
then yes, it's safe, though the coop hasn't devoted resources to support that path immediately.ref: