Discover RAM's with exceptional writing to contribute to the Official RChain Blog
Cultivation of a better bounty system-to-marketing org relationship
Develop greater global opinion using RAM writers vs employed writers
*Tell stories that reach musicians and music-lovers
Budget and Objective
Marketing Organization Expectations: Write a follow-up article to RSong: The Future of Music explaining the details of RSong's answer to music business issues in layman's terms. NOTE: This was my idea, which I am passing along to the Marketing Org in hopes of approval.
Article Structure: Brief intro of RSong with link to previous article; explain specific problems in music industry including interview quotes from Peter Harris, Rudy Harper, and/or Greg Meredith; explain what RSong does to answer those problems, again using quotes; conclusion
Article size: Awaiting Marketing Org expectations
Links to resources:RSong: The Future of Music, RSong: The Future of Sound - RCon3 PresentationImagery: Only use Royalty-Free imagery sourced from the list below unless you are the owner of the photograph is screencapture. Here are some great links to thousands of free images:
https://pixabay.com/https://www.pexels.com/https://www.canva.com/photos/free/http://photos.polarfox.com/https://skitterphoto.com/photos/Is there a number of keywords that should be used? The more the merrier. RChain Keywords.xlsx
Please make the issue SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely.
Estimated Budget of Task: $[400 - 250 Article / 150 Inforaphics and Interview Time]
Approved By: TBD. Reached out to Derek Beres
Estimated Timeline Required to Complete the Task: [2 weeks] to allow for interviews
How will we measure completion? [Article is written, edited, reviewed, approved by RChain Marketing Org, and published]
See CONTRIBUTING.md for details on budget and reward process.
Legal
Task Submitter shall not submit Tasks that will involve RHOC being transacted in any manner that (i) jeopardizes RHOC’s status as a software access token or other relevant and applicable description of the RHOC as an “asset”—not a security— or (2) violates, in any manner, applicable U.S. Securities laws.
Benefit to RChain
Discover RAM's with exceptional writing to contribute to the Official RChain Blog Cultivation of a better bounty system-to-marketing org relationship Develop greater global opinion using RAM writers vs employed writers *Tell stories that reach musicians and music-lovers
Budget and Objective
Marketing Organization Expectations: Write a follow-up article to RSong: The Future of Music explaining the details of RSong's answer to music business issues in layman's terms. NOTE: This was my idea, which I am passing along to the Marketing Org in hopes of approval. Article Structure: Brief intro of RSong with link to previous article; explain specific problems in music industry including interview quotes from Peter Harris, Rudy Harper, and/or Greg Meredith; explain what RSong does to answer those problems, again using quotes; conclusion Article size: Awaiting Marketing Org expectations Links to resources: RSong: The Future of Music, RSong: The Future of Sound - RCon3 Presentation Imagery: Only use Royalty-Free imagery sourced from the list below unless you are the owner of the photograph is screencapture. Here are some great links to thousands of free images: https://pixabay.com/ https://www.pexels.com/ https://www.canva.com/photos/free/ http://photos.polarfox.com/ https://skitterphoto.com/photos/ Is there a number of keywords that should be used? The more the merrier. RChain Keywords.xlsx
Please make the issue SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely.
Estimated Budget of Task: $[400 - 250 Article / 150 Inforaphics and Interview Time] Approved By: TBD. Reached out to Derek Beres Estimated Timeline Required to Complete the Task: [2 weeks] to allow for interviews How will we measure completion? [Article is written, edited, reviewed, approved by RChain Marketing Org, and published]
See CONTRIBUTING.md for details on budget and reward process.
Legal
Task Submitter shall not submit Tasks that will involve RHOC being transacted in any manner that (i) jeopardizes RHOC’s status as a software access token or other relevant and applicable description of the RHOC as an “asset”—not a security— or (2) violates, in any manner, applicable U.S. Securities laws.