search

rchain / bounties

RChain Bounty Program
MIT License
90 stars 62 forks source link

Promoting RChain on Bounty-one(Blockchain discourse web) #778

Closed jasoncruzzy closed 6 years ago

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

Bounty-one A place for blockchain developers and enthusiasts to talk about new ideas and build dapps together. Explore ideas, contribute to them, build the future.

Bounty-one is for blockchain developers to get together and combine their minds to create the truly exceptional!

You can find project ideas, news, learning resources and much more.

Post new ideas or questions that you want to share.

98% members of Bounty-one are BlockChain Developers.

I created RChain account on Bounty-one web to act as a representative(developer) for RChain, sell the RChain ideologies, create RChain awareness amongst developers and possibly on board new developers for RChain. Here is RChain_Coop profile on Bounty-one. Click 👉https://talk.bountyone.io/u/RChain_Coop

OBJECTIVES

Estimated Budget of Task: $[1000] How will we measure completion? [Objectives]

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

We dropped 3 post promoting RChain already and one of the post we got 13views in less than 24hrs and still counting. Check out Bounty-one home page to see posts👉https://talk.bountyone.io

casanwugo commented 6 years ago

Good one @Jasoncruzzy,, i was able to create an account on the bountyone web space. Hopefully, will be able to follow through with what's going on there. Nice work you put!

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

@casanwugo thanks 👍👍

On Jun 20, 2018 08:49, "Ann Chidinma Asanwugo" notifications@github.com wrote:

Good one @jasoncruzzy https://github.com/jasoncruzzy,, i was able to create an account on the bountyone web space. Hopefully, will be able to follow through with what's going on there. Nice work you put!

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/778#issuecomment-398657136, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AjuJeREivurVix1z_-LHrJBr4R0UuV46ks5t-f5wgaJpZM4UsIqm .

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

BlockChain developers getting interested in RChain....see here https://talk.bountyone.io/t/web-interface-to-play-with-the-rholang-language-check-it-out-fam/223?u=rchain_coop

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

Reports of RChain Activity on Bounty-one

pmoorman commented 6 years ago

Hey guys,

there's an issue that I would like to raise here (holds for this issue, but also potentially for other situations):

When one visits the page as it's been created, the impression is that clearly this is an account under the control of the RChain Cooperative. However, this is not the case. (!!)

Whenever we engage in marketing outreach from the bounty system, we should make it abundantly clear that we're representing RChain as a community effort, rather than being fully managed by RChain in a more traditional kind of sense.

The logo used is also something that wouldn't really fit with how we want to portray ourselves.

I suggest that either we I) update the account to accurately reflect the situation (that this is managed by an enthusiastic volunteer, rather than an RChain core representative), or II) close the account altogether.

(btw, don't take this critique too personal. I think we need to better articulate guidelines for such issues. I'll tag some people below so it can be addressed in the future)

cc @ian-bloom @dckc @deannald @patrick727

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

@pmoorman always verify first from source, I have done my introduction in the Bounty-one and I clearly stated my position, I could post a link of that. Don't raise false alarm

On Jul 30, 2018 17:50, "pmoorman" notifications@github.com wrote:

Hey guys,

there's an issue that I would like to raise here (holds for this issue, but also potentially for other situations):

When one visits the page as it's been created, the impression is that clearly this is an account under the control of the RChain Cooperative. However, this is not the case. (!!)

Whenever we engage in marketing outreach from the bounty system, we should make it abundantly clear that we're representing RChain as a community effort, rather than being fully managed by RChain in a more traditional kind of sense.

The logo used is also something that wouldn't really fit with how we want to portray ourselves.

I suggest that either we I) update the account to accurately reflect the situation (that this is managed by an enthusiastic volunteer, rather than an RChain core representative), or II) close the account altogether.

(btw, don't take this critique too personal. I think we need to better articulate guidelines for such issues. I'll tag some people below so it can be addressed in the future)

cc @ian-bloom https://github.com/ian-bloom @dckc https://github.com/dckc @deannald https://github.com/deannald @patrick727 https://github.com/patrick727

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/778#issuecomment-408932798, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AjuJeRH4TnrwTxrp45T8DNbSw_SlbYoiks5uLzlfgaJpZM4UsIqm .

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

@Pmoorman here is a link https://talk.bountyone.io/t/introduce-yourself/13/23?u=rchain_coop , are you clarified now, I hope something more optimistic could be heard now!!

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

@pmoorman you talked about onboarding developers for RChain but you yet to role out a definite plan for but fault moves made by others. 1) presenting the RChain the way I did is more viable at this point, which states the authenticity of the coop 2) In line with being a representative of RChain on Bounty-one, I also resolved to posting RChain approved docs and I have conducted my self there in a professional manner, that is why last week I earned a reputation there as a "Full Member" I will post evidence of that. 3) I have discussed this issue with guider @AyAyRon-P 4) @pmoorman I think you should talk more on the gains and not on less factors, the Co-Founder of blockgeeks,/Bounty-one commended our efforts and commented on a few of my topics(positively) he also indicated interest to join Which he probably has.

pmoorman commented 6 years ago

@jasoncruzzy I don't mean to say that you have any bad intentions, but rather that we all should be more up-front about the fact that we're a community effort rather than an RChain-controlled "official" thing.

Btw, I think this holds much more generally that just this particular issue.

Please, post a bit more about the interest you've gotten from the community. That's what we're looking for here!

dckc commented 6 years ago

In the text of https://talk.bountyone.io/t/introduce-yourself/13/22 I see "I’m Jason a member of the RChain_Coop ..." but the username is RChain_Coop and the avatar is the coop logo. This gives an impression that the 1000+ members of the RChain cooperative have gone through some due process to make you their representative to Bounty-one. Unless I missed something, this isn't the case.

I have similar concerns about the use of the RChain logo / trademark in many of the other channels that bounty system participants moderate (https://github.com/rchain/bounties/wiki/Channels-Moderators ) but at least in most of those cases, @PatrickM727 was part of the process of appointing the moderator. As a coop officer (communications director), he's in a position to speak for the 1000+ coop members.

@jasoncruzzy have you spoken with @PatrickM727 about this? @pmoorman works with @PatrickM727 on such things and as such, I encourage you to take his advice. Change the Bounty-one account name to something like "JasonXYZ" and change the avatar to represent yourself, not the coop.

Note that others in the RChain executive committee have similar concerns; from the July 17 meeting:

ACTION: Add trademark enforcement to agenda

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

@dckc I spoke with @PatrickM727 about the name and logo, clearly stating the position of RChain on bounty-one forum and also requested to retain the name and logo which he did ACCEPT and commended the job done. He approved of it hence the contents generated are sourced from Approved RChain document on our website or other RChain official channels.