search

rchain / bounties

RChain Bounty Program
MIT License
90 stars 59 forks source link

RChain on Bounty-one Forum Report(August) 201808 #931

Closed jasoncruzzy closed 6 years ago

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

BENEFITS TO RCHAIN

RChain on Bountyone Discourse web #778 report for August

2018 I created RChain account on Bounty-one Forum which was approved by the COMMUNITY BUILDING and SOCIAL MEDIA labels to act as a representative(developer) for RChain, sell the RChain ideologies, create RChain awareness amongst developers and possibly on board newdevelopers for RChain.

STATS FOR AUGUST

  1. Contents Generated for RChain on Bounty-one

*Mainnet! (Scalability and speed)~https://talk.bountyone.io/t/mainnet-scalability-and-speed/675/3?u=rchain_coop

*New RNode v0.6.1 supports launch of the RChain Test Net~https://talk.bountyone.io/t/new-rnode-v0-6-1-supports-launch-of-the-rchain-test-net/759?u=rchain_coop

  1. How Many People Read the Topics?

We had a total number of 564 Developers reading(VIEWS) our topics in the month of August, a significant increase from the months of June and July.

  1. Have any of the developers joined RChain?

A member(developer) of the bountyone forum ‘@jackstin’ already joined the official RChain telegram group he introduced himself already and he also join the RChain Community forum. He showed interest in the RChain Cooperative by our topic on bountyone “Mainnet! (Scalability and Speed) see here https://talk.bountyone.io/t/mainnet-scalability-and-speed/675/2?u=rchain_coop

  1. The contents(topic) used are sourced from RChain Approved Documents hence I'm acting as a representative of the RChain Cooperative. The interesting and educating topics besides views have also garned good number of comments from the bountyone forum.

    The RCON 3 Test Net Conference was also promoted in the bountyone forum as one of our topics.

  2. What is the goal of topics addressed?

  1. How have these topics helped built RChain Interest?

The Bounty-one Forum has helped build the RChain interest because with its platform we have constantly created awareness and provided informations about the RChain. With over 550 developers reading(Views) and learning about RChain ideas(contents), firstly it is a strategic point to enlighten developers about RChain and secondly with consistency we will onboard developers for RChain.

  1. Time spent?

     A total of 4 hours daily in the month of August is dedicated on bountyone reading topics, sourcing contents, replying comments or direct messages.

    Estimated Budget of Task:_ $[1300] Timeframe: Month of August Measure of completion: Statistics

See CONTRIBUTING.md for details on budget and reward process.

Legal

Task Submitter shall not submit Tasks that will involve RHOC being transacted in any manner that (i) jeopardizes RHOC’s status as a software access token or other relevant and applicable description of the RHOC as an “asset”—not a security— or (2) violates, in any manner, applicable U.S. Securities laws.

dckc commented 6 years ago

approved by the COMMUNITY BUILDING and SOCIAL MEDIA labels

help us find that approval?

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

Great @dckc, I responded to that in #778

@dckc I spoke with PatrickM727 about the name and logo, clearly stating the position of RChain on bounty-one forum and also requested to retain the name and logo which he did ACCEPT and commended the job done. He approved of it hence the contents generated are sourced from Approved RChain document on our website or other RChain official channels.

pmoorman commented 6 years ago

This issue was hotly debated in the TAC call, where we were lucky enough to have all relevant parties present.

The conclusion from discussion was that in issue like these (where a lot of time is invested, and a retrospective budget is requested), that it is expected for label guides to vote in accordance with "value created for the RChain Coop" rather than in accordance with the work invested by the contractor.

I see that others have already voted a $1300 budget on this issue for the month, but I have voted $50 in accordance with conclusions from the TAC discussion. $50 because of the exposure created and the 1 Telegram subscriber.

I thought I'll write a comment here to clarify, as it might be unexpected to some (and so this can serve as a signal / clarification to other similar situations, too)

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

@pmoorman I was able to respond to all questions on this issue at TAC meeting and also respond to @dckc on consulting guides for this issue, and they thought it was ok after my response. I was also at the meeting and there was no mention of vote 50 for over 100hrs of time spent in a month, sourcing contents and including getting someone on telegram via Bountyone, your vote 50 is totally unjustified as such was not the resolution in the meeting, the least not a vote 50. What's the value of vote 50 after conversion?, that invariably reflects a no value.

pmoorman commented 6 years ago

The conclusion of the meeting was that label guides are responsible to attribute budgets according to "value created" rather than time invested. See the #925 meeting notes for more.

There was no talk of $50 in particular at the meeting, but merely that conclusion as I stated it above. I am not sure if you were already in the call when we discussed that.

It is my judgement as a guide that bringing in 1 Telegram subscriber isn't worth more than $50. Of other people feel different about this, they are free to vote differently, or discuss the worth of a Telegram subscriber (ideally in #775, where it belongs)

jasoncruzzy commented 6 years ago

Thanks @pmoorman 👍👍

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 10:23 pmoorman notifications@github.com wrote:

The conclusion of the meeting was that label guides are responsible to attribute budgets according to "value created" rather than time invested. See the #925 https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/925 meeting notes https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gvv5bVeZjxjXmEuF4HOl1AT4C9kmkDzZwd--Qpa8yZI/edit?usp=sharing for more.

There was no talk of $50 in particular at the meeting, but merely that conclusion as I stated it above. I am not sure if you were already in the call when we discussed that.

It is my judgement as a guide that bringing in 1 Telegram subscriber isn't worth more than $50. Of other people feel different about this, they are free to vote differently, or discuss the worth of a Telegram subscriber (ideally in #775 https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/775, where it belongs)

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/931#issuecomment-419026298, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AjuJeZdGMIq_0TVlhoYq1PeVIcgQuR9Cks5uYOl8gaJpZM4WPxKC .

allancto commented 6 years ago

@jasoncruzzy , @Cryptovideos , @David405 , @casanwugo can you describe why you voted a $1300 budget on this issue? I don't see any guidance on this number.

Thanks! -@allancto

motionfactory-digital commented 6 years ago

@allancto ...Iv made a mistake and actually agree with @pmoorman on his logic here on this particular issue. By no means do i mean to under-value / not appreciate / all the work done , however my understanding on this issue is somewhat limited and thus i do not wish to be directly involved.

Viraculous commented 6 years ago

@jasoncruzzy, @pmoorman, @allancto, what's the progress or hitch on this issue? The last comment was 15days ago. I am closing it for the meantime.

dckc commented 6 years ago

@Viraculous thanks for keeping things moving, but note that closing an issue indicates that it's done, unless it's labelled wontfix or invalid or needs-SMART-objective.

Viraculous commented 6 years ago

@dckc thanks, I think, I am obliged as a coop member to help push things forward not necessarily as a guide.