rchain / bounties

RChain Bounty Program
MIT License
90 stars 62 forks source link

RSong Demo Highlight Reel #983

Closed decentralizebanksy closed 5 years ago

decentralizebanksy commented 5 years ago

Benefit to RChain

Budget and Objective

Please make the issue SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely.

Estimated Budget of Task: $[1500] Estimated Timeline Required to Complete the Task: [1 to 2 Weeks] How will we measure completion? [Issue Closed After Uploading to YouTube and Sharing Link in the Comment Section Below]

https://youtu.be/ooMNSZir6IM

Legal

Task Submitter shall not submit Tasks that will involve RHOC being transacted in any manner that (i) jeopardizes RHOC’s status as a software access token or other relevant and applicable description of the RHOC as an “asset”—not a security— or (2) violates, in any manner, applicable U.S. Securities laws.

luigidemeo commented 5 years ago

is this going to be paid by marketing?

allancto commented 5 years ago

@luigidemeo you ask an excellent question, and not limited to the context of this particular issue. In issue #979 i discuss a proposal in which i argue that the bounty system should be expanded and should be funded directly by vote of our membership on October 24.

Historically, over the past 12 months, ALL bounty funding has come from the Marketing budget. While expedient, I believe it's led to many of the problems we're now addressing with our "reboot". In my opinion Bounty should exist #1 as our testnet for budgetary governance, #2 to support member initiatives.

We've recently seen a lot of talk of departments and respected members of the community sponsoring, endorsing, supporting activities within the Bounty system. I wholeheartedly support that. It works the other way too: the Bounty system may and should be used to sponsor, endorse and support activities of departments and respected members of the community, the activities which our membership feels particularly useful and deserving of expansion and support.

I urge you to support both by your own vote and by seeking support among our membership. The member proposal attached to #979 will give your a genuine opportunity to participate in voting the direction of our Cooperative. It will give you direct control (well, collaboratively with all of our members) at a significant yet appropriate tentative funding level of $3M plus ρ3M. "IOB to Expand, Redefine and Explicitly Fund the Bounty and RContributors Systems" deserves the support of yourself and all of our membership.

decentralizebanksy commented 5 years ago

No, this is a community lead initiative by @Cryptovideos. Just because it has a marketing label doesn't mean it comes from the marketing budget.

luigidemeo commented 5 years ago

@decentralizebanksy we are undergoing a reboot of the bounty program. Marketing will have to pay for the issue if they want it. Without a sponsor, it cannot be funded.

motionfactory-digital commented 5 years ago

@decentralizebanksy @PatrickM727 @patrick727 herewith the Promo link lads 👍

https://youtu.be/ooMNSZir6IM

Tonyprisca13 commented 5 years ago

Nice video.

dckc commented 5 years ago

Just because it has a marketing label doesn't mean it comes from the marketing budget.

That's not the way I see it. Adding the Marketing label is a request for sponsorship by Marketing. Note that the Marketing label is still called zz-Marketing; i.e. it has not been rebooted. As discussed in https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/692#issuecomment-425528811 , it's unlikely that the Marketing label will get rebooted as a whole; rather, more narrow marketing-related processes will each get their own label along with budget norms.

Promotional videos would seem to overlap with Marketing responsibilities. Among the 4 pillars @PatrickM727 outlined, I suppose digital marketing, led by Amir, is most relevant. So please do get in touch with Amir ("make the relevant sociocratic connections"); @JoshOrndorff , perhaps you would make the introduction? Or perhaps you should look into the new Tuesday marketing office hours, @Cryptovideos .

motionfactory-digital commented 5 years ago

Thank you @Dan Connollymailto:dckc@madmode.com for further clarity and direction ill be sure to reach out

Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36


From: Dan Connolly notifications@github.com Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 11:06:40 PM To: rchain/bounties Cc: Cryptovideos; Mention Subject: Re: [rchain/bounties] RSong Demo Highlight Reel (#983)

Just because it has a marketing label doesn't mean it comes from the marketing budget.

That's not the way I see it. Adding the Marketing label is a request for sponsorship by Marketing. Note that the Marketing label is still called zz-Marketing; i.e. it has not been rebooted. As discussed in #692 (comment)https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/692#issuecomment-425528811 , it's unlikely that the Marketing label will get rebooted as a whole; rather, more narrow marketing-related processes will each get their own label along with budget norms.

Promotional videos would seem to overlap with Marketing responsibilities. Among the 4 pillars @PatrickM727https://github.com/PatrickM727 outlined, I suppose digital marketing, led by Amir, is most relevant. So please do get in touch with Amir ("make the relevant sociocratic connections"); @JoshOrndorffhttps://github.com/JoshOrndorff , perhaps you would make the introduction?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/983#issuecomment-425566144, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AkHNY-yt_RTbQg5VnR35dP9EzUxsaE4iks5ufo9ggaJpZM4W68UK.

dckc commented 5 years ago

I see @PatrickM727 budgeted $1500 for this; I just backed that vote with my own.