Open jimscarver opened 3 years ago
We also need a simple String.match capability being considered in #14
... I struggled to concatenate a number and a string ultimately discovering it is impossible in rholag.
Are you quite sure about that, @jimscarver ? String interpolation works when I try it in the rholang playground:
new x in {
x!("${n}${s}" %% {"n": 123, "s": "abc"})
}
[
"123abc"
]
There are many other string functions that are needed like case conversion, finding a substring, and matching patterns.
Regular expressions prove to be problematical due to recursion see https://github.com/rchain/rchip-proposals/issues/19 however filename "glob" pattern matching like [Ss]ubstring are not recursive and could be supported easily https://index.scala-lang.org/salva/scala-glob/scala-glob/0.0.3?
We can also support more types for existing functions easily like string.contains(substring). Any type that makes sense in a function should be supported. This could be done even by scala newbees
Introduction/Motivation/Abstract
develops expect standard string functions including converting other types toString()
Motivating Examples
Examples
Please check the ones we already have. This is a good first issue for someone.
Comparison Examples
I struggled to concatenate a number and a string ultimately discovering it is impossible in rholag. Nothing should be impossible in rholang.
Counter-Examples
Design
Counter-Examples
Drawbacks
Alternatives
References