search

rchain / rpublishing

Other
1 stars 5 forks source link

Snapshot user balances #27

Open Bill-Kunj opened 3 years ago

Bill-Kunj commented 3 years ago

Genesis will give REV to the validator, but 'publisher', 'attestor', and 'buyer' will not have rev. A demo requiring an initial transfer of REV to publisher, attestor, and buyer will not be as smooth as a demo in which these users already have rev. Proposal: put the private keys for the publisher, attestor, and buyer into genesis. Then our snapshot will already include the necessary balances

David405 commented 3 years ago

Proposal: put the private keys for the publisher, attestor, and buyer into genesis. Then our snapshot will already include the necessary balances

From what I know, this is the way it works right now.

Genesis will give REV to the validator, but 'publisher', 'attestor', and 'buyer' will not have rev. A demo requiring an initial transfer of REV to publisher, attestor, and buyer will not be as smooth as a demo in which these users already have rev.

I am trying to understand what this means

Bill-Kunj commented 3 years ago

Genesis needs the private keys and initial balances. We need the keys first and then update the genesis to include them.

Bill-Kunj commented 3 years ago

Genesis will give REV to the validator, but 'publisher', 'attestor', and 'buyer' will not have rev. A demo requiring an initial transfer of REV to publisher, attestor, and buyer will not be as smooth as a demo in which these users already have rev.

I am trying to understand what this means

It's an argument that the demo should not include a transfer of REV from the validator to the attestor/publisher/buyer as a part of official demos.

David405 commented 3 years ago

Genesis needs the private keys and initial balances. We need the keys first and then update the genesis to include them.

As I said, the keys are already inside genesis.

David405 commented 3 years ago

So, as I said earlier, I suggest we use the same rnode snapshot so we can all can all work with the same registry URI, what do you think?

Bill-Kunj commented 3 years ago

So, as I said earlier, I suggest we use the same rnode snapshot so we can all can all work with the same registry URI, what do you think?

This is a great idea. Remember that the snapshot needs to be available to everyone, including the demo systems. Where shall we keep it?

Also, as I update and test the rholang, the URI will change. Which means we'll need to update the snapshot from time-to-time.

David405 commented 3 years ago

sorry about the closing, it was a mistake

Bill-Kunj commented 3 years ago

I think https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-large-files/versioning-large-files will work for snapshot storage.

Bill-Kunj commented 3 years ago

@TheoXD @David405 This remains a technical issue we need to figure out. Once we release, upgrades are inevitable and the URI will be updated.