search

rcmc2020 / ltsanalyzer

Level of Traffic Stress Analyzer
MIT License
8 stars 1 forks source link

Parking aisles, driveways, footways #2

Open YaroShkvorets opened 6 years ago

YaroShkvorets commented 6 years ago

Rob, I'm writing routing tool that takes into account LTS and I've noticed that you don't have parking aisles, driveways and footways. Any specific reason not to? Would be good to have them so I don't have to hardcode those specifically. I would think parking aisles, driveways should have LTS 2. Footways - LTS 1.

Also could you generate new LTS json files for the most recent extract of entire city (apparently current .NET SDK can't be installed on my MacOS version so I can't do it myself)

rcmc2020 commented 6 years ago

Hi Yaro,

There was a discussion about whether to include driveways and parking aisles and I believe that they weren't considered appropriate. Heather said that main roads in parking lots should be classified as service roads if they function as thoroughfares while parking aisles and driveways are only connections to places to leave your car.

Footways should be included as long as they don't specifically exclude bicycles. If you have an example of a footway that should be included but isn't, let me know. It might be a bug.

I am not near a connection to my computer right now to re-generate the files. I can do it on Monday. Does MacOS have a .Net framework? If so, you can download the .exe and .config from the release page on github https://github.com/rcmc2020/ltsanalyzer/releases and regenerate the files yourself. If not and it's urgent, let me know and I'll see what I can do.

Thanks for the feedback. Rob

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 1:40 AM, Yaro Shkvorets notifications@github.com wrote:

Rob, I'm writing routing tool that takes into account LTS and I've noticed that you don't have parking aisles, driveways and footways. Any specific reason not to? Would be good to have them so I don't have to hardcode those specifically. I would think parking aisles, driveways should have LTS 2. Footways - LTS 1.

Also could you generate new LTS json files for the most recent extract of entire city (apparently current .NET SDK can't be installed on my MacOS version so I can't do it myself)

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rcmc2020/ltsanalyzer/issues/2, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADus70hLRm-pVpawN10uEBB2ropt-_Uqks5tQ_9IgaJpZM4R4EYb .

rcmc2020 commented 6 years ago

I have regenerated the .json files. They are available at http://mobiletest.beyond2020.com/bikemap2/data/ and are named level_1.json to level_4.json.

MapZen is no longer available so I did a direct export using overpass-api. Let me know if you see any problems or missing data.

YaroShkvorets commented 6 years ago

Comparing to the previous data set by file sizes it seems like there is quite a difference. Do you know why?

[image: [ ]] level_1.json http://mobiletest.beyond2020.com/bikemap2/data/nov28/level_1.json 2017-12-29 07:37 3.7M [image: [ ]] level_2.json http://mobiletest.beyond2020.com/bikemap2/data/nov28/level_2.json 2017-12-29 07:37 9.2M [image: [ ]] level_3.json http://mobiletest.beyond2020.com/bikemap2/data/nov28/level_3.json 2017-12-29 07:37 3.2M [image: [ ]] level_4.json http://mobiletest.beyond2020.com/bikemap2/data/nov28/level_4.json 2017-12-29 07:37 1.2M

[image: [ ]] level_1.json http://mobiletest.beyond2020.com/bikemap2/data/level_1.json 2018-02-05 11:13 5.2M [image: [ ]] level_2.json http://mobiletest.beyond2020.com/bikemap2/data/level_2.json 2018-02-05 11:13 6.6M [image: [ ]] level_3.json http://mobiletest.beyond2020.com/bikemap2/data/level_3.json 2018-02-05 11:13 5.6M [image: [ ]] level_4.json http://mobiletest.beyond2020.com/bikemap2/data/level_4.json 2018-02-05 11:13 1.1M

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:33 AM, rcmc2020 notifications@github.com wrote:

I have regenerated the .json files. They are available at http://mobiletest.beyond2020.com/bikemap2/data/ and are named level_1.json to level_4.json.

MapZen is no longer available so I did a direct export using overpass-api. Let me know if you see any problems or missing data.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rcmc2020/ltsanalyzer/issues/2#issuecomment-363140103, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcPLHkYK57K06-6osQPCI9pxcBjd86fsks5tRy1pgaJpZM4R4EYb .

-- Best Regards, Yaro Shkvorets

rcmc2020 commented 6 years ago

I think you pulled the old data from data/nov28 rather than just /data. When I compare the old files from /data, they are very close (5.2, 6.8, 5.7, and 1.0 M).

YaroShkvorets commented 6 years ago

Ah ok.

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:44 PM, rcmc2020 notifications@github.com wrote:

I think you pulled the old data from data/nov28 rather than just /data. When I compare the old files from /data, they are very close (5.2, 6.8, 5.7, and 1.0 M).

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/rcmc2020/ltsanalyzer/issues/2#issuecomment-363215483, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcPLHqhcdupxed4E-ViS8gCzpx4FuquIks5tR2gygaJpZM4R4EYb .

-- Best Regards, Yaro Shkvorets