Open kburk1997 opened 6 years ago
This issue was duplicated in #59 - I'll close that issue to keep this discussion isolated here
Defining an "excess" of mentors is discussed here: https://github.com/rcos/rcos-handbook/issues/58
Once issue #58 is resolved, we should add that information under "TODO: define what constitutes an excess of mentors"
I just noticed some circular logic in our draft policy:
Under "Mid-semester":
If no current mentors agree to switch small groups within one week, a new appointment may be made following the procedure above.
Under "First Month" (above "mid-semester"):
If there is no waitlist and we do not get any applicants from the emergency application within 1 full week, we may follow the mid-semester procedure of moving mentors between small groups.
We should add something along the lines of "If after one week of following the procedure above, there is no waitlist and we have no new applicants, we will not appoint any new mentors unless the mentor shortage results in 1 mentor in a small group", similar to something we put in the "final month" section.
We may need to change "1 mentor" to "2 or fewer mentors" in both cases, depending on how big the small group in question is.
We should also discuss new mentor training for emergency appointments. Unless a large number of mentors leave at once, a one-on-one debrief/training session with a coordinator could potentially replace the mentor training requirement for any mentors appointed after the last mentor training session of the semester has taken place.
The same policy could be applied to anyone who has a documented reason to have missed all mentor training sessions.
Description of Issue:
Currently, we have no protocol in place for when mentors/coordinators leave during the semester. Proposed Solution:
Create a policy outlining what to do and whether to replace the mentor/coordinator leaving or to move a mentor from one small group to another. This policy may be dependent on: