At the moment if any of the external validators fail due to an unexpected error (eg 500 error, the service times out) we just accept what the user gave us and log a warning.
This is fine but I wonder if we should give them some indication that we weren't able to do validate properly?
At the moment if any of the external validators fail due to an unexpected error (eg 500 error, the service times out) we just accept what the user gave us and log a warning.
This is fine but I wonder if we should give them some indication that we weren't able to do validate properly?