search

rdarie / Data-Analysis

Borton Lab LFP Neural Data Analysis
0 stars 0 forks source link

Inconsistent chan_grp annotations in spike diagnostic plots #14

Closed rdarie closed 5 years ago

rdarie commented 5 years ago

Capture Left is Trial002, Right is Trial001

rdarie commented 5 years ago

according to analysis-code/nsp_map.prb: 4: {'channels': [59], 'geometry': {59: (0.0, 2000.0)}} however, according to tdc_Trial001/nsp_map.prb: 4: {'channels': [32], 'geometry': {32: (2000.0, 0.0)}} according to tdc_Trial002/nsp_map.prb: 4: {'channels': [59], 'geometry': {59: (0.0, 2000.0)}}

The peeler GUI is consistent with the spike diagnostic plot (chan_grp 4 is elec93 for Trial001, and elec39 for Trial002). Capture

My current interpretation is that Trial001's prb file is old and was written by a different version of the code, and went unfixed for a while.

rdarie commented 5 years ago

After starting over, tdc_Trial001/nsp_map.prb 4: {'geometry': {32: (2000.0, 0.0)}, 'channels': [32]} tdc_Trial002/nsp_map.prb 4: {'geometry': {32: (2000.0, 0.0)}, 'channels': [32]} analysis_code/nsp_map.prb 4: {'geometry': {32: (2000.0, 0.0)}, 'channels': [32]}

rdarie commented 5 years ago

Got rid of problematic .prb file that was being uploaded to CCV from the local copy of the code base, fixed it.