Closed berndbischl closed 8 years ago
+1
Does the argument --nocleanup
work for you guys?
rcheck --help
No, because it is not the default.
I can see why one does not want these files filling up the project dir, but why not put them in the temp, and leave them there, and print out the path to the logfiles?
(Which is exaxtly what happens now, minus the "leaving the directory, instead of removing it")
The temp directory should not be removed with --nocleanup
?
You are not answering to what I said?
The temp directory is already persistent if you pass the argument.
If you do not like the default, you can always toggle it by defining a bash alias.
Reason to not make nocleanup
the default: /tmp
is nowadays usually mounted as tmpfs. If you do not clean up, you might end up using a considerable amount of memory on systems with longer uptimes (e.g., compute servers).
Ok, thanks for the info in the last reply at the end.
What happens is that people get confused here:
Status: 1 ERROR
See
‘/tmp/RtmpiAht3F/BBmisc.Rcheck/00check.log’
for details.
And then that dir does not exist. I would at least point them to the "nocleanup" option in a helpful info message.
Preferrably at the end of the output.
An info in case of the default would be fine.
I need to read them in cases of error