Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
...and this is the oven that turns on during the night and eat up more than 16
kWh...
I'm not python expert but, how many times the value is readed on the serial
port before taken as "confirmed"?
Thanks.
Original comment by evazzo...@gmail.com
on 19 Apr 2013 at 7:18
Attachments:
The grabber is listen permanently on the output from the Envi. If the Envi
sends new usage data for this sensor and it is different to the lastest it will
be written into the database.
To test if the usage data from the envi is wrong or if there is a bug in the
grabber I need your help.
Start the grabber in debug mode and pipe the output into a file.
You can do this with the parameter "test"
python /path/to/grabber/data-input.py test > file
f.e.:
/usr/bin/python /usr/local/measureit/python/data-input.py test > /tmp/test.txt
In the test.txt file you will find the original xml output from the Envi in
this format:
<msg><src>CC128-v1.29</src><dsb>00392</dsb><time>08:22:20</time><tmpr>22.9</tmpr
><sensor>1</sensor><id>03118</id><type>1</type><ch1><watts>00073</watts></ch1></
msg>
If you get an other spike you can look in the file
Original comment by lalelu...@gmail.com
on 19 Apr 2013 at 3:40
Thank you for the reply and suggestion.
I did the test and isolate the spike. I think we're not so far to the solution
but I'm like a donkey with regex and python is an alien for me... ;-)
So, I found this spike:
<msg><src>CC128-v0.12</src><dsb>00659</dsb><time>07:17:30</time><tmpr>27.5</tmpr
><sensor>4</sensor><id>03074</id><type>1</type><ch1><watts>00255</watts></ch1><c
h2><watts>32767</watts></ch2><ch3><watts>32766</watts></ch3></msg>
I observe that normally rows are shorter than this:
<msg><src>CC128-v0.12</src><dsb>00659</dsb><time>07:17:36</time><tmpr>27.5</tmpr
><sensor>4</sensor><id>03074</id><type>1</type><ch1><watts>00000</watts></ch1></
msg>
and only <ch1> is posted on the serial port. My sensor 1 has <ch1> only (I
suppose) because it's an appliance.
Measureit, in the case of the spike, takes a different channel than ch1 (I
don't know if ch2 or ch3) with a bad value.
This happens with sensor 5, too.
I attach a complete log for your better analysis.
I tried to sync Current Cost time with os time. "Tried" means "forgive some
seconds of difference".
Thank you so much!
Original comment by evazzo...@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2013 at 8:17
Attachments:
Sorry, "My sensor 4 has <ch1> only (I suppose) because it's an appliance."
Original comment by evazzo...@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2013 at 8:19
Ok. I take a look at the data
The <ch1> is the default channel you get with an iam or with a sensor with 1
clamp.
Are there more than 1 clamp you get more channels. <ch2> and if there are 3
clamps at the sensor <ch3>
The Envi told measureit there is a sensor with 3 clamps. For whatever reason....
<msg><src>CC128-v0.12</src><dsb>00659</dsb><time>07:17:30</time><tmpr>27.5</tmpr
><sensor>4</sensor><id>03074</id><type>1</type><ch1><watts>00255</watts></ch1><c
h2><watts>32767</watts></ch2><ch3><watts>32766</watts></ch3></msg>
If there is more than 1 clamp measureit count up each channel to get the
complete usage and insert the value into the database to the sensor with the id
4 and if there are clamps configured in the admin from measureit it will add
each usage to the clamp.
I test this with your xml and measureit wants to insert 65788 watts which is
correct.
65788 = 255 + 32767 + 32766
<ch1><watts>00255</watts></ch1>
<ch2><watts>32767</watts></ch2>
<ch3><watts>32766</watts></ch3>
I can not figure out why measureit uses only the data from <ch2> on your system
However I insert a test that looks if the clamp is configured in measureit
admin and only in that case the consumption is counted up.
I am not sure that this is a good solution but test it with this version from
the grabber
https://code.google.com/p/measureit/source/browse/trunk/measureit_system_files/p
ython/data-input.py
Original comment by lalelu...@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2013 at 11:48
Hi.
The version on the link seems to fixed the problem (after a night and a day of
test)... Thank you so much!
I suppose the problem is the sensor: current cost uses the same hw for all
sensors, and for the new IAMs, too.
They probably have the electronic circuit for 2nd and 3rd probe, but without
probe and pull-down resistor they read EM interferences as a value...
I still have a problem on sensor 0 (it was there before): a "spike to zero"
occurs really often (see attach).
I tried to watch the LCD for a while and I never seen a value of 0 in the total
(it's impossible because of the standby of some appliances connected).
The test logfile shows these zero, so I have they in the graph, in the log, but
not while watching the LCD display on the current cost monitor.
Does measureit "interpret"/decode the serial output into the XML we see in the
log file or is the logfile a RAW version of the serial output?
My Envi is CC128-v0.12, is very old, I need to be sure if there is a problem in
sensor reading in order to decide to buy a new revised one...
Thank you.
Original comment by evazzo...@gmail.com
on 22 Apr 2013 at 9:35
Attachments:
The XML in the log file is the raw output from the envi.
If you found 0 watt usages in there so the Envi told measureit there is
currently 0 watt usage.
Original comment by lalelu...@gmail.com
on 22 Apr 2013 at 4:40
FIxed with current Version 115
Original comment by lalelu...@gmail.com
on 23 Jun 2013 at 12:52
Original comment by lalelu...@gmail.com
on 24 Jun 2013 at 5:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
evazzo...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2013 at 9:40Attachments: