Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Hi Ole,
i'm afraid I was wrong yesterday about the set of paths we need.
On a second thought I realised we do need paths composed of different types
of relations (TypeDef's). This is required for constructing property
chains.
Vladimir
Original comment by vladimir.n.mironov@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2013 at 6:26
Indeed; came to same conclusion after introspection about ONTO-PERLs
functionality:
(1) the set of distinct vertices (get_all_ancestors/descendents) and
(2) the set of paths
requires this non-interuptive construction.
-- In this context, would you w.r.t. the final document, be be able to write a
discussion* of why you think we are not getting the correct answer when
building the paths discreetly?
<-- With the term "discreetly" I imply building separate sets of paths for
"is_a", "part_of", "produces", "develops_from", etc.
* If you would, I might be able to find a loophole giving alterantive room for
efficiency gains ;)
Original comment by oeks...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2013 at 8:50
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
oeks...@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2013 at 4:09