Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Most init.d services have a different name to the executable. synecdoche-client
sounds about right.
You may want to find a packaging expert and talk conventions.
Original comment by didacty...@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2008 at 3:20
I'm considering changing the install makefile so that the init.d script isn't
installed at all. Which basically means, let's temporarily disable the feature
(starting on boot) until it's cleaned up :)
Original comment by nicolas....@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2008 at 3:28
I have disabled installing of the init.d script in r387, until I fix it. Bumping
milestone.
Original comment by nicolas....@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2008 at 5:05
I'm starting to think Linux autostart on boot should be handled by the
distribution
packagers, not us ("upstream"). Thoughts?
Original comment by nicolas....@gmail.com
on 20 Jan 2010 at 6:37
This issue was updated by revision r1362.
Original comment by nicolas....@gmail.com
on 6 Apr 2010 at 1:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
nicolas....@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2008 at 2:44