rdpstaffmsu
commented
8 years ago Hi, Feng,
Sorry for the delayed reply! Our taxonomic scheme for Cyanobacteria was derived from the phylogenetic clusters from Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (2nd ed. Vol. 1: p487-493; 2001). This is due to the lack of formal nomenclatures to many taxa under this phylum, including the genus Anabaena.
RDP has used this system for long and we are currently reviewing it for updating according to currently taxonomic opinions and available sequence data.
Let me know if you have questions.
Sincerely,
Benli Chai RDP Staff
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Feng Zeng notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi
I am using the standalone RDP classifier to annotate our assemblies But I find that the RDP nomenclature is different from NCBI nomenclature, such as the NCBI genus Anabaena of phylum Cyanobacteria is named as GpI according to RDP classification The inconsistence between two nomenclatural systems makes me confuse and cannot determine the identity apparently Is there any tool can give the mapping between these two nomenclatures?
Thank you very much
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/rdpstaff/classifier/issues/12.
RDP Staff Ribosomal Database Project Center for Microbial Ecology Michigan State University 567 Wilson Rd. Room 2225 A East Lansing, MI 48824 (517) 353-3842
Hi
I am using the standalone RDP classifier to annotate our assemblies. But I find that the RDP nomenclature is different from NCBI nomenclature, such as the NCBI genus Anabaena of phylum Cyanobacteria is named as GpI according to RDP classification. The inconsistence between two nomenclatural systems makes me confuse and cannot determine the identity apparently. Is there any tool can give the mapping between these two nomenclatures?
Thank you very much.