Closed pchainho closed 7 years ago
This relates to the TURN service and not to the LHCP. Kay is implementing it for DT and Ewa leads for Orange. We did not have any stacks in the QoS-related runtime core part.
I understand the LHCP is one component of reTHINK QoS Control and now we have to specify how to fully integrate it in the Core Framework
Simon is working on integration of TURN-based solution and will provide soon a description along with isolated piece of code.
@EwaJan @sbecot Perfect. Let's sync next week then on how to structure the corresponding section in the deliverable. Any preferred time / date for a short call?
Syncing with @sbecot , there is currently no interaction with the runtime; so there is ongoing discussion if this section should be skipped in this deliverable and included -- once available -- in the QoS-focused deliverable.
I'll propose a meeting to clarify this
@pchainho please initiate a doodle poll for a call.
Here is the doodle link:
Hi all, I will be on vacation for the next two weeks. However, as heard from Steffen, there is a proposal to re-arrange/move that section towards the next phase. A short notice that this is still under consideration and will be evaluated in further progress of the project seems valid for the current deliverable. I would consider that as a feasible progress.
Otherwise, I am back on 19th September and can contribute to this. Hence, until the end of the month, we might have some time to iterate on a contribution for that
Do you have other opinions how to proceed?
I leave the decision(s) up to you and will contribute as soon I am back.
Sorry and Best Regards,
Kay
From @pchainho message in https://github.com/reTHINK-project/dev-runtime-core/issues/105 I assume that we will provide our contributions in the location given therein, i.e., https://github.com/reTHINK-project/specs/blob/master/qos/readme.md .
Per last telco focusing on the QoS contributions, @pchainho will take what we will provide there, and integrate that in D3.5 (i.e. he takes the editorial lead for the QoS section in the Word document to be delivered to the EU).
To proceed here, we need to agree and close on https://github.com/reTHINK-project/specs/issues/16
@Endebert and I feel that the library-based approach is doable; but we need all partner to agree that we proceed this way.
Closing. All contributions are available, see:
https://github.com/reTHINK-project/specs/issues/16 https://github.com/reTHINK-project/specs/blob/master/dynamic-view/qos/readme.md https://github.com/reTHINK-project/specs/blob/master/qos/readme.md
see https://github.com/reTHINK-project/dev-runtime-core/issues/105