Open pchainho opened 9 years ago
If I'm not wrong, we do not have a use case to a third human to a H2H communications. Does it make sense to create a new use case for this (not only focus on a "Collaborative entity")?
We have #86 for Multiparty and this use case is also valid for multiparty conversations. If this is what you mean, it should be enough to add a Variant for Assistant Services in Multiparty conversation, what do you think?
Indeed, #86 is enough.
Actors
Alice and Bob are Identified Consumers that are subscribers of different Communication Service Providers.
In addition, Alice and Bob are subscribers of different Specialised Collaborative Service Providers.
Pre-conditions
81 #83 Alice and Bob are registered in different CSPs
84 Alice and Bob have subscribed to different Collaborative Assistant Providers
2 #86 Alice and Bob are having a Conversation
Description
Assistant Services Payment / Business Models
Variants
Differentiation - Market Relevance
New concept?