continuing with this same analysis as the previous note, it ran the stage 1 model fine, then seemed to do the 500 replications of the stage 2 model, but something happened at that point - see image. also, notice that the replication number is listed as "102" for non-decile replications. i suspect that these values of "102" aren't supposed to be printed out.
continuing with this same analysis as the previous note, it ran the stage 1 model fine, then seemed to do the 500 replications of the stage 2 model, but something happened at that point - see image. also, notice that the replication number is listed as "102" for non-decile replications. i suspect that these values of "102" aren't supposed to be printed out.